From: Thomas Kavanagh <tkavanagh-3r7Miqu9kMnR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>,
Wolfram Sang <w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jean Delvare <khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org>,
"linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
<linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck-3r7Miqu9kMnR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: (algo-pca) Fix chip reset function for PCA9665
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 16:14:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CC77B638.1126D%tkavanagh@juniper.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120913134128.GA1343-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
Wolfram,
Hopefully the information below explains the problem with the current pca9665_reset() function.
Regards,
Tom
Let's say mod1 has the following
typedef struct mod1_pca_data_ {
int number;
unsigned int bus;
char name[50];
i2c_algo_pca_data *adap;
} mod1_pca_data_t;
static struct i2c_algo_pca_data mod1_pca_algo_data = {
.write_byte = mod1_writebyte,
.read_byte = mod1_readbyte,
.wait_for_completion = mod1_pca_waitforcompletion,
.reset_chip = mod1_pca_resetchip,
.i2c_clock = 400000,
};
/*
*
*/
static struct i2c_adapter mod1_pca_adapter = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
.algo_data = &mod1_pca_algo_data,
.name = "Mod1 PCA Bus Adapter",
.timeout = HZ,
};
void mod1_pca_attach(struct device *dev, mod1_data_t *mod1_data)
{
mod1_pca_algo_data.data = mod1_data;
mod1_data->adap = &mod1_pca_adapter;
mod1_data->adap->dev.parent = dev;
i2c_pca_add_bus(mod1_data->adap);
}
Within the i2c-algo-pca module, all calls to pca_outw(adap) and pca_inw(adap) will be done with an input parameter of type i2c_algo_pca_data. These will intern call mod1's read_byte and write byte functions and pass in adap->data as the first parameter. This data pointer is of type mod1_pca_data_t * in this example.
Now with the pca9665_reset() function, the i2c-algo-pca module sets the mod1's reset_chip function pointer to pca9665_reset. When pca_reset(adap) is called, the input parameter is of type i2c_algo_pca_data as expected. Then pca_reset() calls adap->reset_chip (pca9665_reset) with the first parameter being adap->data. This parameter is of type mod1_pca_data_t * in this example. The problem comes from the fact that pca9665_reset(void *pd) is expecting the parameter to be of type i2c_algp_pca_data:
static void pca9665_reset(void *pd)
{
struct i2c_algo_pca_data *adap = pd;
pca_outw(adap, I2C_PCA_INDPTR, I2C_PCA_IPRESET);
pca_outw(adap, I2C_PCA_IND, 0xA5);
pca_outw(adap, I2C_PCA_IND, 0x5A);
}
All calls to pca_outw(adap) in this function are passing in a pointer to mod1_pca_data_t and not i2c_algo_pca_data which in turn causes the kernel to panic when the pca_outw(adap) macro tries to access adap->write_byte().
On 9/13/12 6:41 AM, "Guenter Roeck" <linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org<mailto:linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 12:14:23PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 08:39:50PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> From: Thomas Kavanagh <tkavanagh-3r7Miqu9kMnR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org<mailto:tkavanagh-3r7Miqu9kMnR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>>
>
> The parameter passed to pca9665_reset is adap->data, not adap. Unless
> adap->data happens to point back to adap, this can result in a kernel panic.
Like every write and read to a register which uses the same assumption
AFAICS?
You lost me there. Other reset functions are aware of and use the passed parameter
(adap->data). pca9665_reset overwrites the original reset function with
pca_data->reset_chip = pca9665_reset;
but not ->data (which it can't overwrite since it is used by the read_byte and
write_byte functions).
static void pca9665_reset(void *pd)
struct i2c_algo_pca_data *adap = pd;
static void i2c_pca_pf_resetchip(void *pd)
struct i2c_pca_pf_data *i2c = pd;
static int i2c_pca_pf_readbyte32(void *pd, int reg)
struct i2c_pca_pf_data *i2c = pd;
Guenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-13 23:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-13 3:39 [PATCH 1/2] i2c: (algo-pca) Fix chip reset function for PCA9665 Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <1347507591-32352-1-git-send-email-linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-13 3:39 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: (algo-pca) Fix mode selection " Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <1347507591-32352-2-git-send-email-linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-13 10:05 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120913100530.GD14237-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-13 13:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2012-09-13 10:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: (algo-pca) Fix chip reset function " Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120913101423.GE14237-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-13 13:41 ` Guenter Roeck
[not found] ` <20120913134128.GA1343-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-13 23:14 ` Thomas Kavanagh [this message]
[not found] ` <CC77B638.1126D%tkavanagh-3r7Miqu9kMnR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-14 12:12 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <20120914121244.GE2630-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
2012-09-14 18:23 ` Thomas Kavanagh
2012-09-14 12:51 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CC77B638.1126D%tkavanagh@juniper.net \
--to=tkavanagh-3r7miqu9kmnr7s880joybq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=groeck-3r7Miqu9kMnR7s880joybQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-0h96xk9xTtrk1uMJSBkQmQ@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).