public inbox for linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krishna Kothapalli <krishna_sunitha-PkbjNfxxIARBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org
Cc: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: RE: Looking for ICH SMBUS "Process call" support in i2c-i801 bus driver
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:54:11 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <COL117-W52FEEADBC012C39EE0485188CB0@phx.gbl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091009083519.2659a79a-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>


 <20091009083519.2659a79a-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0


Hi Jean=2C


Thanks much for your response.=20

1) Thanks for correcting: ADM1066 as you mentioned does not require process=
 call.

2) From eeprom AT24C64 sheets: It support  Sequential Random Read. After th=
e micro controller receives a data word=2C it responds with an acknowledge.=
 As long as the EEPROM receives an acknowledge=2C it will continue to incre=
ment the data word address and serially clock out sequential data words... =
The sequential read operation is terminated when the micro controller does =
not respond with a zero but does generate a following stop condition".

The above seems to map to SMBUS Process Call Cycle with I2C_EN=3D1b.

Pls suggest.


Thanks=2C
Krishna



----------------------------------------
> Date: Fri=2C 9 Oct 2009 08:35:19 +0200
> From: khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org
> To: krishna_sunitha-PkbjNfxxIARBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org
> CC: linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> Subject: Re: Looking for ICH SMBUS "Process call" support in i2c-i801 bus=
 driver
>
> Hi Krishna=2C
>
> On Thu=2C 8 Oct 2009 19:09:27 -0400=2C Krishna Kothapalli wrote:
>> I have a couple of devices EEDPROM and Power Sequencer(ADM1066) that nee=
d "Sequential Random Read" which has 2 byte address requirements.
>> Currently Process call is not implemented in code drivers/i2c/busses/i2c=
-i801.c.
>
> This is correct. Adding process call support to the i2c-i801 driver
> would be easy=2C I even think some developers have done it already but
> omitted to send the changes upstream.
>
> However=2C beware that SMBus process call is _not_ 2-byte addressing. It
> is single-byte addressing=2C followed by two bytes from master to slave=
=2C
> followed by two bytes from slave to master. Are you certain you need
> SMBus process call for the ADM1066? The datasheet doesn't mention it.
> All the SMBus transactions mentioned in the ADM1066 datasheet are
> already supported by the i2c-i801 driver.
>
>> Appreciate any suggestions for alternative implementations.
>
> Please make sure you know what your needs are=2C first.
>
> --
> Jean Delvare
> http://khali.linux-fr.org/wishlist.html
 		 	   		  =0A=
_________________________________________________________________=0A=
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.=0A=
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/171222986/direct/01/=

  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-10-09 23:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-08 23:09 Looking for ICH SMBUS "Process call" support in i2c-i801 bus driver Krishna Kothapalli
     [not found] ` <COL117-W70326CE4BD5366E7F94C688CC0-MsuGFMq8XAE@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-09  6:35   ` Jean Delvare
     [not found] ` <20091009083519.2659a79a-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-09 23:54   ` Krishna Kothapalli [this message]
     [not found]     ` <COL117-W52FEEADBC012C39EE0485188CB0-MsuGFMq8XAE@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-10  7:09       ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]     ` <20091010090951.1fd0e1a0-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-15 20:42       ` Krishna Kothapalli
     [not found]         ` <COL117-W4849AF5757A0D75EED6B5E88C50-MsuGFMq8XAE@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-16  7:02           ` Jean Delvare
     [not found]     ` <20091016090225.53438bdd-ig7AzVSIIG7kN2dkZ6Wm7A@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-16 20:36       ` Krishna Kothapalli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=COL117-W52FEEADBC012C39EE0485188CB0@phx.gbl \
    --to=krishna_sunitha-pkbjnfxxiarbdgjk7y7tuq@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox