From: "Danilo Krummrich" <dakr@kernel.org>
To: "Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Jean-François Lessard" <jefflessard3@gmail.com>,
"Wolfram Sang" <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
"Daniel Scally" <djrscally@gmail.com>,
"Heikki Krogerus" <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
"Javier Carrasco" <javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators
Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2025 19:22:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DCJC7Q9MZEM3.34FU7BXXZ7UGF@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aLhAKJBUNQVH1Vmf@kekkonen.localdomain>
(Cc: Javier)
On Wed Sep 3, 2025 at 3:18 PM CEST, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Do we really need the available variant?
>
> Please see
> <URL:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/Zwj12J5bTNUEnxA0@kekkonen.localdomain/>.
>
> I'll post a patch to remove fwnode_get_next_available_child_node(), too.
Either I'm missing something substantial or the link does indeed not provide an
obvious justification of why you want to send a patch to remove
fwnode_get_next_available_child_node().
Do you mean to say that all fwnode backends always return true for
device_is_available() and hence the fwnode API should not make this distinction?
I.e. are you referring to the fact that of_fwnode_get_next_child_node() always
calls of_get_next_available_child() and swnode has no device_is_available()
callback and hence is always available? What about ACPI?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-03 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-02 19:04 [PATCH v4 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-02 19:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] " Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-02 19:11 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-03 10:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-03 13:18 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-03 16:43 ` Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-03 17:22 ` Danilo Krummrich [this message]
2025-09-04 5:56 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-04 7:03 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-04 7:43 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-04 8:51 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-04 11:54 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-04 12:39 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-04 16:14 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-16 16:18 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-25 20:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-09-02 19:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] i2c: core: Use fwnode_for_each_child_node_scoped() Jean-François Lessard
2025-09-03 13:19 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-25 20:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-09-03 10:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-04 9:49 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-09-04 9:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-04 10:13 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-09-04 10:38 ` Sakari Ailus
2025-09-10 12:53 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-09-12 22:28 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-09-15 6:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2025-09-25 10:54 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DCJC7Q9MZEM3.34FU7BXXZ7UGF@kernel.org \
--to=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
--cc=jefflessard3@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).