public inbox for linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Hanna Hawa <hhhawa@amazon.com>
Cc: jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
	jsd@semihalf.com, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dwmw@amazon.co.uk, benh@amazon.com,
	ronenk@amazon.com, talel@amazon.com, jonnyc@amazon.com,
	hanochu@amazon.com, farbere@amazon.com, itamark@amazon.com,
	lareine@amazon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: designware: use u64 for clock freq to avoid u32 multiplication overflow
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:44:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5m3Lh0wte/HN9NH@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221214103418.64431-1-hhhawa@amazon.com>

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022 at 10:34:18AM +0000, Hanna Hawa wrote:
> From: Lareine Khawaly <lareine@amazon.com>
> 
> In functions i2c_dw_scl_lcnt() and i2c_dw_scl_hcnt() may have overflow
> by depending on the values of the given parameters including the ic_clk.
> For example in our usecase where ic_clk >= 1000000, multiplication of

It's hard to count 0:s, can you use plain words instead (like million, billion)?

> ic_clk * 4700 will result in 32 bit overflow.

> This commit change the ic_clk to be u64 parameter to avoid the overflow.

Read Submitting Patches about imperative mood in the commit messages.

...

Smells like you are missing the Fixes tag.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



      reply	other threads:[~2022-12-14 11:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-14 10:34 [PATCH 1/1] i2c: designware: use u64 for clock freq to avoid u32 multiplication overflow Hanna Hawa
2022-12-14 11:44 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y5m3Lh0wte/HN9NH@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=benh@amazon.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=farbere@amazon.com \
    --cc=hanochu@amazon.com \
    --cc=hhhawa@amazon.com \
    --cc=itamark@amazon.com \
    --cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jonnyc@amazon.com \
    --cc=jsd@semihalf.com \
    --cc=lareine@amazon.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ronenk@amazon.com \
    --cc=talel@amazon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox