From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACE0C49EA6 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 15:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1BB161C42 for ; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 15:30:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229916AbhFZPcv (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jun 2021 11:32:51 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:50374 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229890AbhFZPcv (ORCPT ); Sat, 26 Jun 2021 11:32:51 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12A0C61627; Sat, 26 Jun 2021 15:30:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1624721428; bh=2UxB53HP75l/vNHDJAp80mRZXu0ELhhNcYaBvs1m6ws=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CRtrx/dinH0isTGYQJxRHI2a+qjA8V1bLxqqDA4OGwEj6ucTzCDDDMkHOHrCq+kHi MxFzgYEyOiFJvu0lBRU5pgV9q+bLcQjiDrA+HjluEOyCnKT4HaiqrVju6KEKor8+qX 0DGEnVRinQc9J6juGuSp9qwnqQQC2Eqfx3w0hgDwZHHEeCYdCHz1Ir4hn98rum8acX 1aFPMBgjvWSYIjDw+nFp/XvGNeFe6bnMKx0iSOk0FregRshnbZDmMkq4P9I226HVvn bisPSe0lUgNNTTPeDr0vt6T1fcbSOqwoM6pA5g4sM8sAOKsNA2ACxsgDNUTj7mh2J7 bJ6Dx/ljyyJLg== Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2021 17:30:25 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Jean Delvare Cc: Linux I2C , Crestez Dan Leonard Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Rework block read support among i2cget and i2cdump Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Jean Delvare , Linux I2C , Crestez Dan Leonard References: <20210608172338.0cf520a1@endymion> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BsviPprBJodQtJHb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210608172338.0cf520a1@endymion> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --BsviPprBJodQtJHb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Jean, > The idea would be to get the first 6 patches in the upcoming i2c-tools > v4.3, and apply the 7th patch "later" (either immediately after that > release, or some time later, I'm not sure). I agree with this approach. I had a glimpse at the patches and think they look good so far. I would have squashed patches 1+2, but this minor, of course. I'll try to test them this weekend, too. Let's see... --BsviPprBJodQtJHb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmDXSA0ACgkQFA3kzBSg Kbaw2A//V5Iv5+6frfm2Cvbr6e0PgX1A/FlIZxfEwxBYe9Iagnhv77vMNjuSulb+ ATlO6cndbt79B9etJ2PLAhA+AvwvaeqZe+XrKZ1NLf0gKurLZ8WDrnhsvplIFRRE yW1tWE754tZqNaw8k3NuH0fnOyg9eqlactTq+qwXy6CkPco1JzUakN502s1dGLRZ ecWAU1sJRLxVONS5peU3vRlZjz+SgozVhkm3koo93WQjUPwLZikatDf0tQDeUMHH cvp7G35tVgG5Viz5FvnzJU6MxTCvMLiHI/BJF+X+IvRqSS4/+53NySzJ/OXxYIvh PaBLFqVLWOCfcpp49H4EIolHauEn2fd9MP80Gb54a2ltmGm78ZOmrM+4cRYp7LpO 7ZyfW/GGDFAGmXewSDniE4DT6Q2WtIgYnFrib/yXQHb6u6+lADPcg8NYh5UY8Pz6 oVnpJwhbPD++IocaeE/hefPhy2WLtPI2jdUVJVol6no3pMjPjqSme/xtSaakN9dx oRFU/mYs+ePA4ZifEFMBaYr6AC6kU7WmH+8BIc7oyxLwsOX7IAnHH+UPPoNcoTsp PDivEgZJi+paSbh9Rqgs7m1otaJd5YolVSsYCQbJKNyNCYDygZjk04yePQCEW+9Q zjlQQjKCRPwYqm/Yt3ueYUu7A9T+H7COWW+AeqanAlR0oBZ/Xl4= =rjDs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BsviPprBJodQtJHb--