From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D3FC48BC2 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 10:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724E361C18 for ; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 10:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230090AbhF0KaJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jun 2021 06:30:09 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35886 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229761AbhF0KaI (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jun 2021 06:30:08 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 188496162A; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 10:27:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1624789664; bh=vVw5PZgFN+xiXyWsqG7wR0O+gaVJo4vVjfd2eqIso80=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Sis793UlgHMkkbOCbvj0kN5C6nla2o+iQshcI97DFaNMOiX5TTuptWVrDtgMOmYo8 23WVR5t6IkXIaO6MH4L45lskJGsYx8wpDAfb3T0upBBAQUhM2VFj4SblWVqoCM3Ufu Mj+YtSl2tbHzmVDaIP1O6o8Pyd0SvHZCy+WNvuISeVpnU4eqCeYAtkj5BSwFSoytJW FEyDfhf2WIvXjI00IhS6a7/9bE6ZGPRBWXZ5wMAa4f7s+Q7DvV2gIVm/VQxlT/29jw 9JMuwDFmCtfgEJmTtIOgvaS4z9Xsz0+6NbQE5TCYLqE6FoXRPtCnc20Skl810FFvfT fGJVpiK79rBiA== Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 12:27:40 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Jean Delvare Cc: Linux I2C , Crestez Dan Leonard Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] Rework block read support among i2cget and i2cdump Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Jean Delvare , Linux I2C , Crestez Dan Leonard References: <20210608172338.0cf520a1@endymion> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Xg2KXkE0Ca7EKXOy" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210608172338.0cf520a1@endymion> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --Xg2KXkE0Ca7EKXOy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > The idea would be to get the first 6 patches in the upcoming i2c-tools > v4.3, and apply the 7th patch "later" (either immediately after that > release, or some time later, I'm not sure). So, my tests so far went nicely and looking more at the patches didn't reveal any major discussion point. So: Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang Tested-by: Wolfram Sang I'd vote also for an early removal. The code cleanup is too nice and i2cget is, in deed, the better place for mode 's'. --Xg2KXkE0Ca7EKXOy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmDYUpwACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYYdg/7BvQtfzyf26yb6q8FRvuqQ/FirGko01DeLNIA9YW+adC0/MNnonjwKFn8 7KtM8F3n678xBntNzZbon5JCWt2h6i1RmtVMN3qGAbMZ0oNHNXysqEJCcHCa01Dm R+ts+0EO0spgByEusR24OWH8V8TJlizIpBKWduLz1MGP9OZN5A6H8SDPYzR2z3UY ry5NaiRYOHeRhg+DPGFssW30lMpK+ejRT1Jjm34yBhR4Dx3IRpzJKwZSwsQpzuF7 EyUpHfmrSTl4vhGOamZhC8mmktaK6SrWUwITFHO3+Ocj2qHb9ldcVflvV8CVlM7y 2mLGHgm21++4G19xn/p26yMyrA/uMMp/H9DWX5RvHyGQ5GP9BggWBtHascvkE1OA lQ2y7X5KXifNC5/ZjGMrsxr+gmI/snaVmPuHHmC0yMuq8ZF1u7yb93iABuEjrz5p nZDy5b6C1fDYVXmJgO8gQL4a72VRKrHUrBoAR3pxcW4gRR+hDfUQecNSRC8eSxuN R/NVi8WCvRGBhPHXNxjPS0YEDxClWitgMLX5SX+M8pnQ9rFEaEhJZPX1eYyFUNxl VxZC0dB8t9M7UnlUXhfRuliVowo3AthzZEwrTOcjsY3a8e/fIH53vVH0FLR9WvK0 ZeM/HiQ/8f0m2RIffIhXuq0dgoYfwf3dQgrj8FNIt8ty1VJiz58= =BIVW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Xg2KXkE0Ca7EKXOy--