From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64B17C433EF for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 13:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F8CA6103A for ; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 13:56:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232241AbhKGN7V (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2021 08:59:21 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:38410 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232018AbhKGN7U (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Nov 2021 08:59:20 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5546A610CB; Sun, 7 Nov 2021 13:56:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1636293393; bh=ntcOaB39mE90ziGkA5DJC7KRvRLFm+eOIDtFf3JWZcY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ny0enYILNur8/0L0xMWrtwCT5blgiBiOR/EZyi3Gz3+/OevH/sQQSrMTBNogglRWq JYMXsLWZurBDKlMrlMWU3YB9/+flBhkV06/H8VeUjA+Nw6lvBGiqzdjRxNNzfz2/Z2 Gr6o/TyxvI9J5v1R8wJMDh0ohwGLkDTJ0ipzY4puNcNFGRxRYpYULePpcKO65sH/9i YkEsHP5GpchmfUOpaCAlvTiBlBDwNnyCQA5Pv7JDKc4A0hldynJOIXRnMTgc6+YADn rcmBRK1Df7bHeZ4EJ5K3GQ3QkmQDgUsgqHnRVhJLaiW/eReJm1lOa/Y7nAT7hWrvnV tu+iFhbf7cxzw== Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 14:56:23 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: Jean Delvare , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: Did "i2c: i801: Add support for Intel Ice Lake PCH-N" get lost? Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Heiner Kallweit , Jean Delvare , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z4iA/pO/TVqkUXvt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --z4iA/pO/TVqkUXvt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi Heiner, On Sun, Nov 07, 2021 at 01:09:11PM +0100, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > According to patchwork history here the patch was applied to for-next on Oct 17th. > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20211001172154.15660-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com/ > However I don't see the patch in i2c/for-next and linux-next. > Did it get lost somewhere? Uh, seems you are right. Sorry, I don't have an explanation for this. No idea how it happened. So, lots of thanks for reporting it. I added it to for-mergewindow again. I'll double check that I didn't lose other patches from around that time... Kind regards, Wolfram --z4iA/pO/TVqkUXvt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmGH2wAACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYaOQ//YYQgj+t1Q/4QAXiEguqWqODXCqaFPgmJvbkTmHny9EP8nm+EYs/rHIGf dzbKsiAKrJVYbRspv6+H28PpBcHi7GzFxft2SjlaCwisOsE8IuQEbdn6V3/6boCr YLvolbfF4aK2GVBnAiocV1z+e4ZlHY7yvg6ouhs24pazF6tfhBlgTpynUfuqeXcC k7Am4tQ0VLqwZKpldB9q7nWtLL4ipADhsPdkwRMtx6cN+IUL8BV4a82n4EJ2xch3 JImwoeXYk769TDOOxnTehL6Td4MhY9BpQmSJENV2TcgYCKr18LvaYCY65wHfimN5 HdKzMXGhlkbl727/UkP35oBOEyOP6vLQO4jYCpFkthOT8W47Y7JYSWlMZ/q8/AVx s6raR6pTIFBCSeiGzGySRiG6J1JzyqJ50gP7jgLuoG/vlbtOPjuSTbn4awgAhl8m NPbUlMWY1FvCxwK4hiW3W+LiF+kdVrY4aT2QgxldKp2KuHGNL6NasSqsxrrKw+qn mFpR5abikKMCbC64ZSsR4qAzfjfyTJWepD/04O0Se8/SjF6FpQ2LJimXaZUyRetZ Cx4myDi5vQMBNFU//znj73BTcIMyQT7BjRSb49a3ug9AWr6vrj6XbiiGakCXDkhl XtVbib8z/Zqnt9bwzCXR2giliiGAR6i5YltPwFJuGJc2ikjhdXI= =QpuF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z4iA/pO/TVqkUXvt--