Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix the kernel doc description for struct dw_i2c_dev

Randy Dunlap
2021-11-15T15:47:17Z

On 11/12/21 8:43 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 11/12/21 8:26 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 6:01 PM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> wrote:
>>> On 11/12/21 4:34 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> + * @rinfo: I²C GPIO recovery information
>>>
>>> Preferably:   "I2C"
>>
>> Why?
>
> See below vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv:
>>> like it is in thousands of places in the kernel source tree.
>
>
>> UTF-8 has been established for more than a decade. I prefer to use the
>> proper form of the abbreviation (*).
>>
>> *) Check UM10204.pdf.

> > Yes, I am aware of what is in the spec.
>
> Wolfram, what do you prefer?

>I prefer I2C. But it is more a reading habit. I would neither enforce
>I2C nor I²C.

OK, let's leave it as Andy sent it then.

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunla@infradead.org>

--
~Randy