From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27996C433EF for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 20:51:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229774AbiCKUwM (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:52:12 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:47588 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229535AbiCKUwL (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:52:11 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EEC21D981F; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 12:51:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D75AB61F99; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 20:51:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF049C340E9; Fri, 11 Mar 2022 20:51:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1647031864; bh=zmuWKozrUfnxutVRlths6JXC2XxK1VKUeowuBiagvhA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=S2WNf1lJT3t/VZEr+1IuLr89QbIyi9Kb/z9xp3TFGUnmgJm+rY1jfGd1ieRDDCAgF uGvXD5A2EmXwfZL3DBSbJeLRxMItDJIyDJUj9VR3Z19PxQZbaPyHjY1rlvJ2pdmDZj VIpeZ3IteKG0+hlzhM45S9OtgGBlttAFvSQWL921m2xA5PaJtxcmSajigOQXR4v0I4 lVejpEFMUlaSBHstv5PR0MwVU6dZl3wHoq9iy7a7WSV23YTQGJcgMlO26h8rJ2qsvS 4lVDxN0lOdfTOh+MQSNOP2umCm2X00YmclMp+g1UHRCYKsdRPSAzBtsyu/AjU1miu1 F+K1GDCu3srrw== Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2022 21:51:00 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Jan Dabros Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, upstream@semihalf.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] i2c: designware: Remove code duplication Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Jan Dabros , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com, upstream@semihalf.com References: <20220310220932.140973-1-jsd@semihalf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rdPYt9goBFHRhha0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220310220932.140973-1-jsd@semihalf.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --rdPYt9goBFHRhha0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 11:09:32PM +0100, Jan Dabros wrote: > Simplify code by moving common part to one function. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jan Dabros > Suggested-by: Andy Shevchenko Is it really based on for-next? I can't apply the patch. Am I missing something? --rdPYt9goBFHRhha0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmIrtjQACgkQFA3kzBSg KbZrnxAAifHU+tNf8a+mdHxvRXSHdQEceI62pvHsfwFJEVQpHhty6sm8iUyHU593 Ju8iK2Oja1W4fd383sg5w1uvHv0eTrlzHPNgccDYJ/X6QfFc1z0N54gSILgYwyk+ rfQpbzj9ZBydmk+y7ObAhmbLVitD6rGnwko/7vZvPlWbQ3vFvYtHR4s7oTsMFJGL EFYEtac9/hcjm0+iDJc8t7Yg1eclRVIUvwQh8PJlNTHNH9yFNqE6Asjeynl1d3lk e1hMUJ9iMMVEbowxuu/w2RXRbeQovbfvUoc76ppyOCtcv1rJWAwKG/dfOMgbOSoa uFe/+zJqAhWntOtun6x6D4FoDAFt2oMs9cUBHKwfKpIF1c+VmMbYZmcAioW1n0K7 sz4Vk9BnQv1pjYmNfnWGAF67BCgvCSGh+FkR2lOjXJJbE+4uZ6myw6ujdFOatCnO XmiFj4X2R/V+wHA7nicqjw8ncsuE+c3EWj33IZBCQzxxpnvOH699u7NUBAvEZVdP P2vUS8kWFFQWadrC5uE0hBrudXsPuVshreDwdwppqr0LtBKY2qYYtOZhhCLuLj2D EJjI4btjZQreSdZmmecW3CyVsdf38dlV/PfEHaM8UtnonBBYyETDt6UdtTjH/TFx GCD/ts4bAi1bzSw8DuevIC59Z1pQ8xPUrxc5sanrIuM+X2U3e3Q= =W6+Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rdPYt9goBFHRhha0--