From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: "Gabbasov, Andrew" <Andrew_Gabbasov@mentor.com>
Cc: "linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
"Surachari, Bhuvanesh" <Bhuvanesh_Surachari@mentor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: rcar: add SMBus block read support
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 18:29:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Ykcod/XOYvGfUsga@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a07902900bc4ecc84bd93a6b85a2e0c@svr-ies-mbx-02.mgc.mentorg.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 966 bytes --]
> > /* If next received data is the _LAST_, go to new phase. */
> > - if (priv->pos + 1 == msg->len) {
> > + if (priv->pos + 1 == msg->len && !recv_len_init) {
>
> If a message contains a single byte after the length byte,
> when we come here after processing the length (in the same function call),
> "pos" is 1, "len" is 2, and we indeed are going to process the last byte.
> However, "recv_len_init" is still "true", and we skip these corresponding
> register writes, which is probably incorrect.
> The flag in this case should be re-set back to "false" after length
> processing and "pos" moving, but I think the variant in my patch
Confirmed. Tests fail with only one extra byte and clearing
'recv_len_init' fixes the issue. I don't think this is the proper
solution, though. I think it will create more readable code if we update
the checks. So people will understand what we are aiming for. The
current code is already implicit enough.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-01 16:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-22 16:06 [PATCH] i2c: rcar: add SMBus block read support Andrew Gabbasov
2021-10-05 13:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-10-06 18:11 ` Andrew Gabbasov
2021-10-06 18:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Andrew Gabbasov
2022-02-17 19:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-02-18 11:02 ` Gabbasov, Andrew
2022-03-15 10:45 ` Surachari, Bhuvanesh
2022-03-30 11:04 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-04-01 16:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-04-01 16:29 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2022-03-23 21:52 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2022-03-30 10:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-03-30 11:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-03-31 16:02 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2022-04-01 16:38 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-04-05 9:30 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2022-04-05 9:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-04-06 17:32 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2022-04-06 19:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-11-18 10:35 ` [PATCH] " Andrew Gabbasov
2022-01-09 19:20 ` Andrew Gabbasov
2022-01-25 6:45 ` Andrew Gabbasov
2022-02-17 14:40 ` Andrew Gabbasov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Ykcod/XOYvGfUsga@ninjato \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=Andrew_Gabbasov@mentor.com \
--cc=Bhuvanesh_Surachari@mentor.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).