From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Eugeniu Rosca <erosca@de.adit-jv.com>
Cc: Andrew Gabbasov <andrew_gabbasov@mentor.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bhuvanesh Surachari <bhuvanesh_surachari@mentor.com>,
Eugeniu Rosca <roscaeugeniu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: rcar: add SMBus block read support
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2022 18:38:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YkcqoIMF2uw4FSZh@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220331160207.GA27757@lxhi-065>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2099 bytes --]
Hi Eugeniu,
> BTW, thanks to Bhuvanesh, we've got another patch [*] which tries
> to combine the best of both worlds:
>
> * DMA support in the v1/v2 patches from Andrew/Bhuvanesh
> * Simplicity of your proposal in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Yg6ls0zyTDe7LQbK@kunai/
This was nice to see. But where does it come from? I don't see it on
this list and I also couldn't find it in the regular BSP?
> Unfortunately, this patch has a dependency to the rcar_i2c_is_pio()
> in https://github.com/renesas-rcar/linux-bsp/commit/55d2d2fb8b0
> (which should be resolvable by extracting the function).
This patch is obsolete since March 2019. It has been properly fixed with
94e290b0e9a6 ("i2c: rcar: wait for data empty before starting DMA"). I
am still trying to feed this information back.
> Do you think we are on the right track with this new approach or do
> you feel the implementation is still overly complicated?
The approach is much better but there are still things I don't like. The
use of 'goto next_txn' is bad. I hope it could be done better with
refactoring the code, so DMA will be tried at one place (with two
conditions then). Not sure yet, I am still working on refactoring the
one-byte transfer which is broken with my patch. What we surely can use
from this patch is the -EPROTO handling because I have given up on
converting the max read block size first. We can still remove it from
this driver if that gets implemented somewhen.
> + if (!rcar_i2c_is_pio(priv)) {
> + /*
> + * Still try to use DMA to receive the rest of
> + * data
> + */
> + rcar_i2c_dma(priv);
> + goto next_txn;
> + } else {
> + recv_len_init = false;
> + }
So, I'd like to get rid of this block with refactoring.
> u32 func = I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SLAVE |
> - (I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL & ~I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK);
> + (I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL & ~I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK) |
> + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_READ_BLOCK_DATA;
Still not using the new macro to include PROC_CALL, but that is easy to
change.
All the best,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-01 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-22 16:06 [PATCH] i2c: rcar: add SMBus block read support Andrew Gabbasov
2021-10-05 13:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-10-06 18:11 ` Andrew Gabbasov
2021-10-06 18:23 ` [PATCH v2] " Andrew Gabbasov
2022-02-17 19:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-02-18 11:02 ` Gabbasov, Andrew
2022-03-15 10:45 ` Surachari, Bhuvanesh
2022-03-30 11:04 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-04-01 16:27 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-04-01 16:29 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-03-23 21:52 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2022-03-30 10:58 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-03-30 11:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-03-31 16:02 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2022-04-01 16:38 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2022-04-05 9:30 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2022-04-05 9:43 ` Wolfram Sang
2022-04-06 17:32 ` Eugeniu Rosca
2022-04-06 19:44 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-11-18 10:35 ` [PATCH] " Andrew Gabbasov
2022-01-09 19:20 ` Andrew Gabbasov
2022-01-25 6:45 ` Andrew Gabbasov
2022-02-17 14:40 ` Andrew Gabbasov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YkcqoIMF2uw4FSZh@ninjato \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=andrew_gabbasov@mentor.com \
--cc=bhuvanesh_surachari@mentor.com \
--cc=erosca@de.adit-jv.com \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roscaeugeniu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).