From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com,
alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, ludovic.desroches@microchip.com,
andrew@sanpeople.com, mhoffman@lightlink.com, khali@linux-fr.org,
peda@axentia.se
Subject: Re: [RESEND 0/3] i2c: at91: Fixes and updates
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2022 21:46:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YrysFU0fP7X1wkBd@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220614101347.16910-1-codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1020 bytes --]
On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 01:13:44PM +0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
> Resend due to the fact that the i2c list no longer accepts replys on the
> old patch-set. Comments not addressed yet.
>
> The first patch is mostly a prerequisite for the second one. It only
> moves the i2c_recover_bus() out of the actual transfer function. This
> helps the second patch disable the controller before using GPIO
> recovery. The second patch will keep the controller enabled when a
> transfer occurs. Before using GPIO recovery, the controller must be
> disabled, to ignore potential glitches. However, the controller must be
> enabled for HW recovery (bus CLEAR command). The third and last patch
> adds advanced digital filtering support for SAMA5D4. The TWI IP found in
> SAMA5D4 supports advanced digital filtering, even if, at the moment of
> this patch, the SAMA5D4 datasheet does not mention it.
So, can you guys read this mail? It should be possible somehow that I
can read your remarks to my remarks, no?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-29 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-14 10:13 [RESEND 0/3] i2c: at91: Fixes and updates Codrin Ciubotariu
2022-06-14 10:13 ` [RESEND 1/3] i2c: at91: move i2c_recover_bus() outside of at91_do_twi_transfer() Codrin Ciubotariu
2022-06-14 10:13 ` [RESEND 2/3] i2c: at91: keep the controller disabled when it is not used Codrin Ciubotariu
2022-06-14 10:13 ` [RESEND 3/3] i2c: at91: add advanced digital filtering support for SAMA5D4 Codrin Ciubotariu
2022-06-29 19:46 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2022-06-30 7:41 ` [RESEND 0/3] i2c: at91: Fixes and updates Nicolas Ferre
2022-06-30 8:09 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-03-20 22:18 ` Andi Shyti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YrysFU0fP7X1wkBd@shikoro \
--to=wsa@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=andrew@sanpeople.com \
--cc=codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=mhoffman@lightlink.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=peda@axentia.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).