From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84DFC1A3BD7 for ; Fri, 20 Dec 2024 21:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734729651; cv=none; b=nhes8OaUPxePCESDAfuB+EWk070ZKK5/4ShdvHblUr/4qQ8DZQdkQteBzg5a6dL+8vHOG4vdJpWN8YiJy1BFHQskBkx3s8Ve+ZibhlGLpJfBsbB3TdFxZvK0RTTe/d5rSntHKnv2ofnUh8P23TH5NHJ7+5wsAndbxNxRYYAHRpA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734729651; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MjhFa8bJqhTdz6UBNHivFjTo1NItfH8DgUMWVxWfc3w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Oxdv71Sq0kjVqHd/UFjOKr0CFrux9KewYR2f5/F2Nv3biscvqrVpsOHNQqYIVw0RgBh4dw2h7fLTxCF+8BdB5D8jafCqKHVaQYZEc1hEzDVOc/EF1jZUwhmMHUNHy4z6QFHKyDRGMbEVc/xVOqwtam6oXt7NcZ1s85WFQcTULh8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=dcMNtuP7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="dcMNtuP7" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=MjhF a8bJqhTdz6UBNHivFjTo1NItfH8DgUMWVxWfc3w=; b=dcMNtuP7Pn8iHw6mnXz+ D5aO0pHzaYmCt4fI4BirVuCSuUUPztd5qGr9A4LN/O7mueyTCs0/DbG5QPa3knpI QNMV+XsFWznf+GonLonqhji/MMeH9Orvmpdk+vcYVN/VQ9hfHpgX5JUWvND2ZldK 8T8Ts8HwiLj/REJ+OqgEoL7zFTouJMYBLuzDzMKCT+HQWRglstOnqdzewnPlenrG M8DsyXGylbnzRvnlN6m2otz8y8yQwGPqd/i+um2lqY2lmK0z2Co1NV8JdMNPhQmY 9ilu/y62OLbvXt1hnoezCarXqF2LU2LpBI6YlKFd3M4jjwRslCyjc4EWUe8W7tl3 Ng== Received: (qmail 1127111 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2024 22:20:47 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 20 Dec 2024 22:20:47 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@SC9pOLop0JoujnsY Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 22:20:46 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Prabhakar Cc: Chris Brandt , Andi Shyti , Philipp Zabel , Wolfram Sang , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Biju Das , Fabrizio Castro , Lad Prabhakar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] i2c: riic: Use GENMASK() macro for bitmask definitions Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Prabhakar , Chris Brandt , Andi Shyti , Philipp Zabel , Wolfram Sang , Geert Uytterhoeven , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Biju Das , Fabrizio Castro , Lad Prabhakar References: <20241218001618.488946-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20241218001618.488946-5-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="TxjIsOP/09NdNLXg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241218001618.488946-5-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> --TxjIsOP/09NdNLXg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 12:16:13AM +0000, Prabhakar wrote: > From: Lad Prabhakar >=20 > Replace raw bitmask values with the `GENMASK()` macro in the `i2c-riic` > driver to improve readability and maintain consistency. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar > Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Again, I think patches 3+4 could be squashed, but this is minor. Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang --TxjIsOP/09NdNLXg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmdl364ACgkQFA3kzBSg KbbkhBAAsiV85GFvsNwG1rJWEOLa0tzefzvXSPxP5HXtq3N9Pzh8cw0/2Cil2vGW 8FBBKXFxEb2Rz8CcR+N/NMJ1+qax/YUhbqw35IDMq3DXWntqP6eAG1Kp2iRNw/p7 cDeX23beC4gpX/othZUxnRrY9WhzmiBKCoDGpHrQPrb2XpD2YefFZjdyYYTDcQfB hKpSwh/iMgVKyx8GmqJuHTl0W8bTy0TH2X04MwEXrU88tRsVPhZQS1m74lR77sJA 9OD4PG1FdifPoO43foaJG+ITMANOpC6hmVqejLfWI5O4H9BmKVYXyWYOJQvx5jxI o/f1wbcxHJrQYCcuLLYiXP08qxNxk0AzVSCmRJZGYfqFetNtlWxqhMXUwzww7cBK 0UgqYtV2b0Y5tSK2qXvEq6kT5s4NGj2M583g1VUQdP8Mr06sTQRIMUvKxLL5wRmW rjBFRHpR+YJ5LfEabwl1KzM9eGA/+9CXnVZv71J/lDA+1BuVYOEaLNhcIDaWgEg7 Q6dol65N9IUTBuVrNtpFHGR4O/2g0Dr44yBbnVqhk8vkOIUM/d84j2Rb21nggqLs Sslmy6eMHUfd3FOboZaf/LP1LLJRgAy2rP3BnOD9dNZmLoMV1yTWkQLKztb6Df3V QYGHPlN6FTyxa6SMrR0VM6oOW/zSK9FcRxLS+GhdaOVFcaYj0T8= =wEjg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --TxjIsOP/09NdNLXg--