From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0534202F67; Tue, 4 Mar 2025 11:53:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741089241; cv=none; b=roR35ELbwdxmLh5AMZMhbLYLp52lUdpXdY2A+0Dm6mwnEdggdczId4QmtXefBDHjh7m1XUhxORBSV7oo+VasWvpHjOvroWq5jeSeGXLni4qD0XJ55khAsIoFcBtZo1yVZ4pmJGnx3mOYECKHJ+9yNvznC8U9Wox6A7oFwtswDyI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741089241; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qq7TZvcZSktmWVe6C6ZIq89UVbAqUNI01Xhm1mJcWnQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LLOLeDwyTW/uKEF8+e8xAMlqhU5mW3ZhwwE3qJoSoRaubCTOR7JT3sehVCJK1tLvMnF1OnQAj+k/mdNv1cfOwA/v2mzagBpPGEgJtlk2aPKH1M3wA5Pe4dAY7+BL2h9qsJ7iQjfnY3Xta07jHqJIO87Di96HYMgGdy4L6V23lwI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=X/3bW/hH; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="X/3bW/hH" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1741089240; x=1772625240; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=qq7TZvcZSktmWVe6C6ZIq89UVbAqUNI01Xhm1mJcWnQ=; b=X/3bW/hHMzh84AXdHNCDWKw289GLJn5Xfcwt2zALu902zSNI03kSI947 /baNtvRDY3degselOQuuigYc0nM5a9qoFf/RrU4W3jsvGcB34WG5Ek9Wx KvcgQqh++g0Uoi5vXK157AvlbHEwh8RxW6G+sJ+GEi0WFA9wXnFbuaS0C Nf2pYTT8LC4HFKNjep5whmhB73BYtop66j1G+GeoRRC7ZxhXlb2BxP3ZW P2lCXjdFxvyyYOOzwjRv9eVjLawIrZdKRnso1AS5I8iGJS/6bgMAbiGut afwWI+IhTgrpin0zi3zRlfywW4YCE2ySdU3xd5qbZbuhvmVhARhEEhCrZ w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gzcVkUZpTICISUgYBbqPRg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tDsEVoA8SEeZHxjL/zyhyw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11362"; a="52639899" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,331,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="52639899" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Mar 2025 03:53:59 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: /IUV9+TERLOqCL7vV5ZhRw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 19jezb68TVK8GAei3XrfqQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.12,224,1728975600"; d="scan'208";a="122484442" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.58]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Mar 2025 03:53:57 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1tpQqQ-0000000H76x-24PC; Tue, 04 Mar 2025 13:53:54 +0200 Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 13:53:54 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Inochi Amaoto Cc: Jarkko Nikula , Mika Westerberg , Jan Dabros , Andi Shyti , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yixun Lan , Longbin Li Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Add ACPI HID for DWAPB I2C controller on Sophgo SG2044 Message-ID: References: <20250304070212.350155-3-inochiama@gmail.com> <53dkcpiewy64hv37kpqhrvpkprr7mgg7bl6f7ofpmpl5utqbe6@yldveipvbisb> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53dkcpiewy64hv37kpqhrvpkprr7mgg7bl6f7ofpmpl5utqbe6@yldveipvbisb> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 07:46:09PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 01:43:27PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:02:11PM +0800, Inochi Amaoto wrote: > > > Add ACPI ID for DWAPB I2C controller on Sophgo SG2044 so > > > the SoC can enumerated the device via ACPI. > > > > Same as per UART: > > > > ---8<--- > > > > This is fake ACPI ID. Please work with a vendor to issue the proper one. > > Vendor ACPI ID registry has no records on Sophgo: > > https://uefi.org/ACPI_ID_List?acpi_search=SophGo > > > > NAK. > > > > ---8<--- > > > > But, it might be that is already in the process of getting proper ACPI vendor > > ID, please provide an evidence in such a case. > > > > Otherwise drag the representative of the vendor to this email thread to answer > > the question why the heck they abuse ACPI specification. > > OK, I will ask for the vendor and check whether there is some > evidence for it. Now let's pause these patch. > > Thanks for your info. You're welcome! As I already replied in another mail, feel free to contact me or give my contacts to the vendor in order to help them to follow the process. I will be glad to help. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko