Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] i2c: Introduce i2c bus extensions

Wolfram Sang
2025-03-20T12:49:55Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 739 bytes --]

Hi Herve,

> The related big picture has been already presented in
> - the 'Add support for GE SUNH hot-pluggable connector' series [0]
> - the 'Runtime hotplug on non-discoverable busses with device tree
> overlays' talk at Linux Plumbers Conference 2024 [1].

Any outcome of the Plumbers meetup? Was this "double-link" solution
agreed on or so? I mean the code is the easy part here, but I would like
to have an agreed approach for handling all kinds of non-probable
busses. I really don't want an island solution for I2C. So, the key
question here is what do DT maintainers think?

You sent code without bindings, but I'd think the other way around would
be better for the discussion.

Makes sense?

Happy hacking,

Wolfram

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]