From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF902C7EE25 for ; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 13:41:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236123AbjFHNlj (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:41:39 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59376 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236193AbjFHNli (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jun 2023 09:41:38 -0400 Received: from pokefinder.org (pokefinder.org [135.181.139.117]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134362712; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 06:41:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (120-123-142-46.pool.kielnet.net [46.142.123.120]) by pokefinder.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 38A59A404B5; Thu, 8 Jun 2023 15:41:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 15:41:34 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Markus Elfring Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Kevin Hilman , Sekhar Nori , Bartosz Golaszewski , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Davis Subject: Re: [linux-i2c] Patch notification: DaVinci: 2 patches updated Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Markus Elfring , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Kevin Hilman , Sekhar Nori , Bartosz Golaszewski , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Davis References: <168613080300.11524.2783831689498520603@legolas.ozlabs.org> <8af5aca3-184f-2561-bec7-c4950fdbaeb5@web.de> <93d2b121-4734-c195-90ad-d2d05e65e247@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3NFxbUdjepFWjCs/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org --3NFxbUdjepFWjCs/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Unfortunately, it seems that the patch quality was still improvable. It was not perfect but good enough. > * How will the patch integration evolve further for suggestions which seem to be > still in waiting queues? Easy, it will evolve quite similar with the amount of review/reviewers. > * How far back would you like to support the known development history > for discussed Linux software components? Dunno, if I got the question right, but I don't want to break existing stuff. Why do you ask? --3NFxbUdjepFWjCs/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmSB2o4ACgkQFA3kzBSg Kba1GA//WoTXPI4WXKo0xggY5ZOQKWOgwTfrW1fMAisdcCvegxN4IY6DnGV02fDz /sdrngtTHZujrom7CFZ2dmwXsKZn7hHqZx4yYu5ZMCLcOwu16V473lyIaG9srxyo UVeBpst6FAqSY4x8NOOdq92swxJXm9wghORpgkXjW9xhcgSFHIl/zyTn0Ivi0wNj Xx3EyM6MelPgEZaEUkqAI/pHbBz7c8noEoFRnaTb9SYk0FVoO9Q0hJzY5P5fPaeA RRrJUgm/Z4LXlvUHHMo+a7mskBtVWpELD0kO7E+InTiUo6PBB0+pEolLPWz7X0r0 a/zmhSNxv7ughWn9AX/i4CLfa2QQEzjM55K7Iy5OUfCNmWuurt5T3WA0kUl+LjAI E8cahXpPU4BDKVPE4GHXGsX0OSEFdW2CFu95vb5Ru5XUu8r+fyoTFLSaLOMTjlIl 6AUkSyDmk02LdGQROX5YzqsEWckuFkLDl+n5pOcVWr9nlXnr3AyLHXI6HavyVr6G 6YLg+DfZgdpWxmhNsk2f8SkLz7f5TP1iGae1vKmWCuNruQfcTZwG6kflPyZNT4Cf S3g1J/hG796rsRYgbxheuh0LMYHS9XAjsQt2FvMJDfRaMbrl5panCScg10oEeaf3 C5nofu2sjGNcaoFn9R7YgiLgY1PWjgYVzSQdfDnVvfQVth18nts= =zqqF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3NFxbUdjepFWjCs/--