From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 1/2] i2c: rcar: reset controller is mandatory for Gen3+
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 11:19:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQlnq4pYp9ZCu0Zs@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdX8Ug6sQX97_CyFbpAN1Emp7d891wJAWg8pLpnM3q+ysQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1317 bytes --]
Hi Geert,
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Thanks!
> > + priv->flags &= ~ID_P_NO_RXDMA;
> > + ret = rcar_i2c_do_reset(priv);
> > + if (ret)
> > + priv->flags |= ID_P_NO_RXDMA;
>
> This is pre-existing, but if rcar_i2c_do_reset() returns an error,
> that means the I2C block couldn't get out of reset. Are we sure we
> can still do PIO transfers in that case, or should this be considered
> a fatal error?
Makes sense. I will double check what to do here.
> > + ret = reset_control_status(priv->rstc);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
>
> This is a pre-existing check, but do you really need it?
> This condition will be true if the reset is still asserted, which
> could happen due to some glitch, or force-booting into a new kernel
> using kexec. And AFAIUI, that should be resolved by the call to
> rcar_i2c_do_reset() above.
This check is needed to ensure reset_control_status() really works
because we need it in rcar_i2c_do_reset(). From the docs:
"reset_control_status - returns a negative errno if not supported,..."
The code only checks for that, not for the status of the reset line.
All the best,
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-19 9:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-13 6:29 [PATCH RFT 0/2] i2c: rcar: improve Gen3 support Wolfram Sang
2023-09-13 6:29 ` [PATCH RFT 1/2] i2c: rcar: reset controller is mandatory for Gen3+ Wolfram Sang
2023-09-19 8:46 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-19 9:19 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2023-09-19 9:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-13 6:29 ` [PATCH RFT 2/2] i2c: rcar: improve accuracy for R-Car Gen3+ Wolfram Sang
2023-09-18 14:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-19 9:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-19 9:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-19 9:36 ` Wolfram Sang
2023-09-19 9:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-19 9:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2023-09-19 9:30 ` [PATCH RFT 0/2] i2c: rcar: improve Gen3 support Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZQlnq4pYp9ZCu0Zs@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox