From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6013A611E for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 19:26:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="U7OyQ8Rl" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9874C433F1; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 19:26:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1705173992; bh=7Rjz5SDxi7gwI4vKdDW+v70uamiT+LrGgBdoQvhYg1s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=U7OyQ8RldgmydI0DwSTlTvqI8kbDKh97DWamrvh7pd68eU06fuvzPR/Sq6pu6u5t1 mi+rbk99C7j5J+sFRnprsDe9FmMQnUb0hVGMllgrla3KIre3WT7ZS8xumR1MqTzl7p OHOIvArmnOA9hisIClgPWXIUnMWelRyNDNFTDL7Tf+tbV76Wm8samTptcNsbjuXgsz 4Cp/CFizu5gnO35qisPpnL8O/tKe9Q0mLtQhLJfRCN1NE0SCfwgO7XT2tEVtVxRYFf wdfbuFFVNzkT7broaxrUpFcA+rxVOmuBGkD9RUkbb5ypZtHJfLzihi2/pFYaS7jDXx QSeADtUs9YfVA== Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 20:26:28 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: Kim Phillips , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Jan Dabros , Andi Shyti , Borislav Petkov , V Narasimhan Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Revert recent changes to i2c_dw_probe_lock_support() Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang , Jarkko Nikula , Kim Phillips , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Jan Dabros , Andi Shyti , Borislav Petkov , V Narasimhan References: <20240111125658.921083-1-jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> <9bb96130-d662-4904-9e4b-6a823b51a990@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="23G4Ezbhft/CDFA/" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9bb96130-d662-4904-9e4b-6a823b51a990@linux.intel.com> --23G4Ezbhft/CDFA/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Hold on, I'm testing this on top of next-20240111 and still seeing the > > splat... > >=20 > Btw, does this reproduce always? Can we be mislead if it happens somewhat > randomly? Happens to boot once we revert some commits and then at another > Andy's nearby commit does not and we make the wrong conclusion? Thanks for all the work trying to find the regression so far. As I want to send out my pull request soon, I think it is safest if I revert the whole series and we start with a clean new version. All the best! --23G4Ezbhft/CDFA/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmWi4+AACgkQFA3kzBSg KbYGSxAAs2Tq7SMtZI0p3BDeW1mnOWq4bsbNTByGtdT+3g6UX1QUAUS4Wu5RihKO DUQk1EBI8ggFDw3zvaeoEytF8VhhX7Z+rMncDHyjd4B7T6sUBoNyvE3HEQrNA6O/ 2ujq+PnotfZ0tKu0+9BmXM1daYNy1fLjQQWz+M5x50FVIuOPDM4nZamRvb5gfplQ /TdyTnw0dDFrxepGToCslcy4J96knyry2rSHeessEEo3D4Mr+ve2CykkHaaD3V7u erlqajYdbKQ7/FfMizi58R2EnL4pBP3eK7bPuAqgKN5Fq443QvaGkeAwtsQqHl/f 6mbPkNbVJKgQbYRzDKw8nvZpWtHQooF98PK+vUeCI+JwWaCniy6s2mTKNyJfRD4j SNWyhrLFNj5AYWTjjz2Evf7YqQG/t1Kuq2WIdhE3NdlEq4b5SPoMsXLn+lng3g7Z O1UlpE9yakjeDrn2p9FhUtWHh/OAhvLbj9sHyrehD1pwAV4TtxeDfsZbLHMy/tHe rsCOTyRGuUhkJfa8mXYyT2oWTdFzafetRq1r4DYj28M1JmSUZouqX4Mpru1/pFjW /zGBJGceBLnoMVeAyvhEEAZpBFF6T6zT7tQAhRCdY0tM2K0TlB3zm6BD0jaHjt6W fTaxsuyTBL6pMRjMkKUF3IQIy4Gj7rKsHMn2QPIJ94HRb0HSDec= =26kL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --23G4Ezbhft/CDFA/--