From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 506855384 for ; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 17:06:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="SK4Vk4zJ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1705251986; x=1736787986; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=oT60TkY3hflXHcjdke3tWBjlwDpFXUGw427kZI9I9mY=; b=SK4Vk4zJaZFYmWOOSgNtyHd8qTLPE36BTU/mLEIuR9IkZq8L1snIBK9T oj3hmeyoilngukCSxbnbDJdHZGiIHs+9qEfWFsNSKa6l+GHc5HGzd2rYQ vVmZdxCmSH1nieCZpHFrUBr4pjjTlJr7qsrRkvWLQw9CUHooBGEKYpqoU q/DgB1slna3UP7vpBYgfj+EQCY/jfN2wK254JtaduBr1MKYZHcS+4YMQZ dTx0wcErcgnsYGgxU1T6PIhyYTl4s6WHLP68fOggDjAPW+tmCEJfOZEUg lGFtu4qgNbFn8Inv0/JFEfVZ6geZw7aI6rvwUjNC9OQQdKskFdrVl9Tvq A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10953"; a="396621058" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,194,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="396621058" Received: from orsmga006.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.51]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Jan 2024 09:06:25 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10953"; a="759642650" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,194,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="759642650" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orsmga006.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Jan 2024 09:06:22 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rP3wB-0000000Dy8Y-3IYy; Sun, 14 Jan 2024 19:06:19 +0200 Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2024 19:06:19 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Wolfram Sang , Jarkko Nikula , Kim Phillips , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Mika Westerberg , Jan Dabros , Andi Shyti , Borislav Petkov , V Narasimhan Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Revert recent changes to i2c_dw_probe_lock_support() Message-ID: References: <20240111125658.921083-1-jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> <9bb96130-d662-4904-9e4b-6a823b51a990@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Sat, Jan 13, 2024 at 08:26:28PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > Hold on, I'm testing this on top of next-20240111 and still seeing the > > > splat... > > > > > Btw, does this reproduce always? Can we be mislead if it happens somewhat > > randomly? Happens to boot once we revert some commits and then at another > > Andy's nearby commit does not and we make the wrong conclusion? > > Thanks for all the work trying to find the regression so far. As I want > to send out my pull request soon, I think it is safest if I revert the > whole series and we start with a clean new version. Oh, but true. Let's start over later on. I will rearrange patches and Cc to AMD in the next version, so we will have unquestionable ones first. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko