public inbox for linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@amd.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-6.8-rc1
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 22:00:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zag_9kYtbL30QjrB@ninjato> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30730c8f-d8f9-4352-ac90-ccec153c32f8@amd.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1743 bytes --]

On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 02:35:47PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 1/16/24 11:02 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > The following changes since commit 2cc14f52aeb78ce3f29677c2de1f06c0e91471ab:
> > 
> >    Linux 6.7-rc3 (2023-11-26 19:59:33 -0800)
> > 
> > are available in the Git repository at:
> > 
> >    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git tags/i2c-for-6.8-rc1
> > 
> > for you to fetch changes up to f4b49e824f0b38e6b5003be97f27c63b96454388:
> > 
> >    Revert "i2c: designware: Fix reset call order in dw_i2c_plat_probe()" (2024-01-14 09:02:34 +0100)
> > 
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------
> ...
> > quite some driver updates. Standing out are patches for the wmt-driver
> > which is refactored to support more variants. And a big series for the
> > designware-driver needed to be reverted because issues have been
> > reported late in the cycle and no incremental fix has been found yet.
> 
> If you're talking about this original report:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231229120820.GCZY62tM7z4v2XmOAZ@fat_crate.local/
> 
> then my AMD system still fails to boot this pull request's 'i2c-for-6.8-rc1' tag,
> and in the same way of the above stack trace.
> 
> It looks like a lot of designware commits did indeed get reverted, except the
> very first one:
> 
>    bd466a892612 ( "i2c: designware: Fix PM calls order in dw_i2c_plat_probe()")
> 
> If I revert it from 'i2c-for-6.8-rc1', the system boots fine again.

Damn, stupid off-by-one error :( I am sorry, thanks a ton for checking my tag!

> Can that commit also be reverted in this pull request?

Sure, I will send an updated pull request.

Thanks again,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2024-01-17 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-16 17:02 [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-6.8-rc1 Wolfram Sang
2024-01-17 20:35 ` Kim Phillips
2024-01-17 21:00   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zag_9kYtbL30QjrB@ninjato \
    --to=wsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=kim.phillips@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox