From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A172C3C46D for ; Fri, 9 Feb 2024 14:25:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707488744; cv=none; b=kRyi6WnIr6saxqLwWpjDgCdNBtG3pyqqg21HPV4a6AGMYYYMS8Zkg6DL8AVviw0rlhDgY9aylhNerCin4LWE8JHhn7XPfM7B57u0i9BlKHQjf6tcim2KrVjZx3V07f6/FowaCYcvu2cpONytuLLMw9BhfSCjqgHHpU2sHzbRDZE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1707488744; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bD0qncuUGI/gKL5gUEf8MWvaO7VXsTutGTkTaVJyyvc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MhMMEko/1KzbCHwOilLIppNTmSe2Lt4NLjaqCpwfEmBm9xHI679QYZj+sySdMvN4vw3hfK46IKUx3bTrV1EXFBIGL/mugaBSNSuYcA5KGoRT2ybrnc3IxZXkehDdaAoODjmzcovl+DI1eywl8yL0n/MeqW8pakCADAH2xG6/ZVQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NmgBiuyy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NmgBiuyy" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1707488743; x=1739024743; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=bD0qncuUGI/gKL5gUEf8MWvaO7VXsTutGTkTaVJyyvc=; b=NmgBiuyyMz58O7Kx4EIaUxzP9yqvyXUmLWH/pTRQi5y1fCLjSfWCYeKP AVZE1wZTCgyeuszpm5ZmTzk3HPpmdHjhUjUb2k4fzvVrMM8KSmuWxobKj VCfi+ISVGh/f8AeKrqhqy+bDCWyZ0OTJsbCWYFlIFj5s7OqSMKZO3SVG1 dbAVsXWALdyMKHGgofD5JcLUSBltRk73KZEL2l+s9WWOZsMaLREAX8IGa 1vRA0STMgJTcaOsBYC9V3cs9BnGf3QlIWL6euxbc1Yefy/ZMV2iKYZ2gi 7SG4w9pqVxqZU3cpcwXRJ3ra/GAKrBt0imi2Jq/5vjIWKgxUG/UxUA+YL g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10979"; a="1340900" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,257,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="1340900" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2024 06:25:42 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10979"; a="910723090" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,257,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="910723090" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2024 06:25:39 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rYRou-00000003AdP-0fDv; Fri, 09 Feb 2024 16:25:36 +0200 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 16:25:35 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Andi Shyti , Mika Westerberg , Jan Dabros , Jiawen Wu , Sanket Goswami , Basavaraj Natikar , michael.j.ruhl@intel.com, Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] i2c: designware: Add some flexiblity to the model info Message-ID: References: <20240206145158.227254-1-jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> <20240206145158.227254-2-jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> <849af5df-4b7d-493c-ad70-b99fc322af90@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <849af5df-4b7d-493c-ad70-b99fc322af90@linux.intel.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 04:14:37PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On 2/6/24 17:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > I was thinking I'll drop these first 3 patches in the next version and go > back to v1 version. IMHO it's better this patchset to focus implementing > generic polling only and not mix with cleaning up the semaphore or other > random stuff. > > So planning to go back to v1 version and take your notes for v2 7/9 and 9/9. > What would you think? I'm fine with that. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko