From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 939BD8288D for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 15:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708701609; cv=none; b=TWsW3bqNzp7ONUSMHKsqDdTRttKbqn6Gp+Y1We6zGGKmKAIQ/FLcmOGr+snrMk0p0LKbFV5FWOIG4ZTA26Zj6LJzCuvUMi0wQ54+ceIpAhss2EFe6ah/LntqMan3uziSPJjGjb4e4E9XZDKmQ6odawQNgRFQixGiG/R4D4Vry4g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708701609; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WatZofJZa7sGjZjsJdj7Yhpb5Jl5j6pb5w8VvpdiJlM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tI3xNwztgOS3pRGH75qhT05I58xb0NQtcFm/C5WuGuTEfdExcj6/07sgRVc0tx6jnplzY2oa4Gl6vQwOHdHU6fcxx4BCR3oAHa0Rg2Rdd0IwsYHQBPOsphLRjjhu8C1VlsvFcnT6UMrf/zsnZx53KH0lxsLD4Qp71DEyqXNtRvY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=YbSI4xlg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="YbSI4xlg" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1708701607; x=1740237607; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=WatZofJZa7sGjZjsJdj7Yhpb5Jl5j6pb5w8VvpdiJlM=; b=YbSI4xlgRScPSgFnSGlu2uWg0Fxb/jq+bNwi/9hGip7CY6mdeshBYLH0 O7GnBloiRHH502GlWq0nxyKPRiyX1b7FvS/9x8ZNO7qmrtswAGRgvLDAt BZFmNsLbKARDMKJDSCcksT1tP8oL04YWNpRHqnslaNKVMnHjURGBtLJP/ lWVTcRS6JICACDN0jYRrie/7xf6tZOTkngljU1i1dbZaVfHAPMzJpE5Pn gJdDAywAqcx13/PFgex8vF+EBcD0hcuKcYjQerQiLuKmVin8Q1IHL6whS WbecqNpHJ8AntI4LcA0/rqhQ8R+SprlK2Id6R2fhI6fgXuNcS2qoAds27 g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10993"; a="6837577" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,180,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="6837577" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Feb 2024 07:20:07 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10993"; a="913748853" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,180,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="913748853" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Feb 2024 07:20:04 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rdXLF-00000006vwn-2KrM; Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:20:01 +0200 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 17:20:01 +0200 From: 'Andy Shevchenko' To: Jarkko Nikula Cc: Jiawen Wu , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, 'Andi Shyti' , 'Mika Westerberg' , 'Jan Dabros' , 'Sanket Goswami' , 'Basavaraj Natikar' , michael.j.ruhl@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] i2c: designware: Generic polling mode code Message-ID: References: <20240213124847.672084-1-jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com> <003901da624b$89c7c190$9d5744b0$@trustnetic.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 05:09:37PM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > On 2/18/24 11:19, Jiawen Wu wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 8:49 PM, Jarkko Nikula wrote: > > > Hi Jiawen, Sanket and Basavaraj > > > > > > I hope you could give a quick test to this patchset to see it won't cause > > > regression on your HW. This is mostly the same than the first version what > > > Jiawen tested earlier but in this 3rd version I decided to drop semphore > > > touching code patches from v2 due they being out of scope and fix a few > > > things noted by Andy. > > > > > > Changes are in the patch 3/6 with two minor fixes to comments while moving > > > them and the patch 6/6 where i2c_dw_wait_transfer() is slightly modified > > > by Andy's suggestion plus I decided to remove one comment which became > > > unclear after this patch. > > > > Hi Jarkko, > > > > I've been testing the v3 patch series on Wangxun 10Gb NIC, it works well, too. > > Thanks! > > > > Tested-by: Jiawen Wu > > > Andy: Was this set ok in your point of view now? Yes, I hoped that Andi applies it earlier last week or so. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko