linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>, Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] i2c: smbus: Improve handling of stuck alerts
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2024 22:01:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZqajkhSiuJ23DCUP@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220110172857.2980523-2-linux@roeck-us.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4166 bytes --]

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 09:28:56AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> The following messages were observed while testing alert functionality
> on systems with multiple I2C devices on a single bus if alert was active
> on more than one chip.
> 
> smbus_alert 3-000c: SMBALERT# from dev 0x0c, flag 0
> smbus_alert 3-000c: no driver alert()!
> 
> and:
> 
> smbus_alert 3-000c: SMBALERT# from dev 0x28, flag 0
> 
> Once it starts, this message repeats forever at high rate. There is no
> device at any of the reported addresses.
> 
> Analysis shows that this is seen if multiple devices have the alert pin
> active. Apparently some devices do not support SMBus arbitration correctly.
> They keep sending address bits after detecting an address collision and
> handle the collision not at all or too late.
> Specifically, address 0x0c is seen with ADT7461A at address 0x4c and
> ADM1021 at address 0x18 if alert is active on both chips. Address 0x28 is
> seen with ADT7483 at address 0x2a and ADT7461 at address 0x4c if alert is
> active on both chips.
> 
> Once the system is in bad state (alert is set by more than one chip),
> it often only recovers by power cycling.
> 
> To reduce the impact of this problem, abort the endless loop in
> smbus_alert() if the same address is read more than once and not
> handled by a driver.
> 
> Fixes: b5527a7766f0 ("i2c: Add SMBus alert support")
> Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>

It fixed the interrupt storm for me and I like the approach. I'd apply
it to for-current once rc1 is released. Two minor changes, though.

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c
> index d3d06e3b4f3b..533c885b99ac 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ static int smbus_do_alert(struct device *dev, void *addrp)
>  	struct i2c_client *client = i2c_verify_client(dev);
>  	struct alert_data *data = addrp;
>  	struct i2c_driver *driver;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	if (!client || client->addr != data->addr)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -47,16 +48,21 @@ static int smbus_do_alert(struct device *dev, void *addrp)
>  	device_lock(dev);
>  	if (client->dev.driver) {
>  		driver = to_i2c_driver(client->dev.driver);
> -		if (driver->alert)
> +		if (driver->alert) {
>  			driver->alert(client, data->type, data->data);
> -		else
> +			ret = -EBUSY;
> +		} else {
>  			dev_warn(&client->dev, "no driver alert()!\n");
> -	} else
> +			ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		}
> +	} else {
>  		dev_dbg(&client->dev, "alert with no driver\n");
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +	}
>  	device_unlock(dev);
>  
>  	/* Stop iterating after we find the device */

I moved this comment up where -EBUSY is assigned to 'ret'.

> -	return -EBUSY;
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -67,6 +73,7 @@ static irqreturn_t smbus_alert(int irq, void *d)
>  {
>  	struct i2c_smbus_alert *alert = d;
>  	struct i2c_client *ara;
> +	unsigned short prev_addr = 0;	/* Not a valid address */

I used I2C_CLIENT_END as an invalid address. We use it for the same
purpose in other parts of the core as well.

>  
>  	ara = alert->ara;
>  
> @@ -94,8 +101,19 @@ static irqreturn_t smbus_alert(int irq, void *d)
>  			data.addr, data.data);
>  
>  		/* Notify driver for the device which issued the alert */
> -		device_for_each_child(&ara->adapter->dev, &data,
> -				      smbus_do_alert);
> +		status = device_for_each_child(&ara->adapter->dev, &data,
> +					       smbus_do_alert);
> +		/*
> +		 * If we read the same address more than once, and the alert
> +		 * was not handled by a driver, it won't do any good to repeat
> +		 * the loop because it will never terminate.
> +		 * Bail out in this case.
> +		 * Note: This assumes that a driver with alert handler handles
> +		 * the alert properly and clears it if necessary.
> +		 */
> +		if (data.addr == prev_addr && status != -EBUSY)
> +			break;
> +		prev_addr = data.addr;
>  	}
>  
>  	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> -- 
> 2.33.0
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-28 20:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-10 17:28 [PATCH 0/2] i2c: smbus: Handle stuck alerts Guenter Roeck
2022-01-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 1/2] i2c: smbus: Improve handling of " Guenter Roeck
2024-07-28 20:01   ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2024-07-29  7:49   ` Wolfram Sang
2022-01-10 17:28 ` [PATCH 2/2] i2c: smbus: Send alert notifications to all devices if source not found Guenter Roeck
2024-07-28 20:04   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-07-29  0:31     ` Guenter Roeck
2024-07-29  7:57       ` Wolfram Sang
2024-07-29 14:23         ` Guenter Roeck
2024-07-29 18:36           ` Wolfram Sang
2024-07-29 18:44             ` Guenter Roeck
2024-07-29 20:52               ` Wolfram Sang
2024-07-29 21:39                 ` Guenter Roeck
2024-06-12 17:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] i2c: smbus: Handle stuck alerts Guenter Roeck
2024-06-12 20:21   ` Wolfram Sang
2024-06-12 20:29     ` Guenter Roeck
2024-07-28 19:59 ` Wolfram Sang
2024-07-29  0:31   ` Guenter Roeck
2024-07-29  8:04     ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZqajkhSiuJ23DCUP@shikoro \
    --to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=wsa@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).