[PATCH i2c-tools v2] README: ask for DCO in contributions

[PATCH i2c-tools v2] README: ask for DCO in contributions

[Wolfram Sang]

Add some documentation we can point contributors to wrt. DCO.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---

Change since v1:
*	s/i2x/i2c/

@Jean: do you agree to asking for DCOs in i2c-tools? Also, together with
the 'i2ctransfer' improvements I just sent out, I think we could aim for
a 4.4 release soon, or? It's been 3 years and the updates are small but
still neat, I think.


 README | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/README b/README
index fb7bd03..2d342e5 100644
--- a/README
+++ b/README
@@ -106,3 +106,11 @@ with Cc to the current maintainer:
   Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
 For additional information about this list, see:
   http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-i2c
+
+CONTRIBUTIONS
+-------------
+
+Contributions are very welcome. Please send them to the linux-i2c mailing list
+mentioned above. Make sure they include a 'Developer's certificate of origin'
+as used for the Linux Kernel and described here:
+  https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin
-- 
2.43.0

Re: [PATCH i2c-tools v2] README: ask for DCO in contributions

[Jean Delvare]

Hi Wolfram,

On Wed,  7 Aug 2024 13:24:33 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Add some documentation we can point contributors to wrt. DCO.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
> 
> Change since v1:
> *	s/i2x/i2c/
> 
> @Jean: do you agree to asking for DCOs in i2c-tools? Also, together with

Yes, fine with me.

> the 'i2ctransfer' improvements I just sent out, I think we could aim for
> a 4.4 release soon, or? It's been 3 years and the updates are small but
> still neat, I think.

OK!

> 
> 
>  README | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/README b/README
> index fb7bd03..2d342e5 100644
> --- a/README
> +++ b/README
> @@ -106,3 +106,11 @@ with Cc to the current maintainer:
>    Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
>  For additional information about this list, see:
>    http://vger.kernel.org/vger-lists.html#linux-i2c
> +
> +CONTRIBUTIONS
> +-------------
> +
> +Contributions are very welcome. Please send them to the linux-i2c mailing list
> +mentioned above. Make sure they include a 'Developer's certificate of origin'
> +as used for the Linux Kernel and described here:
> +  https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin

Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

Re: [PATCH i2c-tools v2] README: ask for DCO in contributions

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 222 bytes --]

On Wed, Aug 07, 2024 at 01:24:33PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Add some documentation we can point contributors to wrt. DCO.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>

Applied to master.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH i2c-tools v2] README: ask for DCO in contributions

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 379 bytes --]

Hi Jean,

> > the 'i2ctransfer' improvements I just sent out, I think we could aim for
> > a 4.4 release soon, or? It's been 3 years and the updates are small but
> > still neat, I think.
> 
> OK!

I just pushed the 3 commits I had pending for 4.4. From my side, we are
ready to go. Do you still have something to be included for 4.4.?

All the best,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

Re: [PATCH i2c-tools v2] README: ask for DCO in contributions

[Jean Delvare]

Hi Wolfram,

On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 20:09:31 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > the 'i2ctransfer' improvements I just sent out, I think we could aim for
> > > a 4.4 release soon, or? It's been 3 years and the updates are small but
> > > still neat, I think.  
> > 
> > OK!  
> 
> I just pushed the 3 commits I had pending for 4.4. From my side, we are
> ready to go. Do you still have something to be included for 4.4.?

Well there's one pending patch which I posted to the linux-i2c list in
May 2022 but never got feedback:

https://marc.info/?l=linux-i2c&m=165338543312881&w=2

There were some changes meanwhile so it must be updated to apply again,
but this is trivial to do. I'll post the updated version, it would be
great if you can test it and we can include it in version 4.4.

Thanks,
-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support

Re: [PATCH i2c-tools v2] README: ask for DCO in contributions

[Wolfram Sang]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 611 bytes --]

Hi Jean,

> Well there's one pending patch which I posted to the linux-i2c list in
> May 2022 but never got feedback:

Now, this is strange. The patch was set to "Awaiting upstream" in
patchwork, probably by me. It seems I set the status first and then I
forgot to reply saying that I was OK with the patch :( Sorry about that!

> There were some changes meanwhile so it must be updated to apply again,
> but this is trivial to do. I'll post the updated version, it would be
> great if you can test it and we can include it in version 4.4.

I'll reply there, thanks for respinning!

Happy hacking,

   Wolfram


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]