From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F2318784F for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 17:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723482795; cv=none; b=P+U0gGIUKzwAGMOgvu7JDtxkllEmnJCC78PaBNt9/qXOUKrDJ6YA3dstFL5ePK5H+XefUdfc/FdaVUu0ViORyd3eFRdZUq4EHuQlDTw/TcbJ4uRRQXtNnhDm6xdRmGFz4TApPK3n2cP0QCgfQNSofcw10nEBH1wydz6CY1z5dA0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1723482795; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RsABGeDtuPGyoFhCf7GJz2J9HzEmeJ8H1I5hvJLzGNY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Cb8NDJA8c3s62HjgHbwkSIoWvx36eCRqkmevYG2vkHnbjMGo7fJ79YM1gWyCdq8MwDE4TgaM6VBsUElWuGgwAe7LsDb54U2p2AZyHtAYI/E8cyXeoxvTb9+gv1/KhanLKEKkuqEsa893P9k18YHcYgyrqPlso9xYlPUjInudc3o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=PghSwiun; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="PghSwiun" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1723482794; x=1755018794; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=RsABGeDtuPGyoFhCf7GJz2J9HzEmeJ8H1I5hvJLzGNY=; b=PghSwiunpZzSmiDNf7HFNOQWewmkVEfg+TafyzVU8Zl5N7k9xUdv1z+u FlCqYHlDvBcXssQzaUUPPmC+mTpgGI+l/JkpqkvmSkoMkhzugLRO66IR7 lBXW+QlFIo0YikVLbMLpkwOSRlKkpI8N5DEibJnTPusIIg3JFE4Dsj9QG 5H3P8hLoGwDen/MrNl+Dqu9gD4c87baUqtwUZJ+F9GXsUkuKQ+aZOBmH7 JEFMkNH4I+DCzlpTIYBati7nZ5EybnDHSURVcIQcdYZ1MVjdsB7QHpEvr Ohqhds3hQ2m51PdJpoUCJfeNJuHebIx59nZej6ZB1I7TsHL2mb6D//v0+ w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: TBg/eYr7Q9yM/tnaff/oog== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4SNMBddqTmG96Am+BH46Tg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11162"; a="33009027" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,283,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="33009027" Received: from orviesa009.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.149]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Aug 2024 10:13:13 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: gPTw32NqSoKCLFChiMJr0g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: OyxgvOmlRPCSeTMV88VMMg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.09,283,1716274800"; d="scan'208";a="58277440" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by orviesa009.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 12 Aug 2024 10:13:11 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1sdYbU-0000000EQNS-1d1e; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 20:13:08 +0300 Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 20:13:08 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Andi Shyti Cc: Adrian Huang , Jarkko Nikula , Mika Westerberg , Jan Dabros , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Huang , Dong Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] i2c: designware: Fix wrong setting for {ss,fs,hs}_{h,l}cnt registers Message-ID: References: <20240802130143.26908-1-ahuang12@lenovo.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Aug 05, 2024 at 07:26:55PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/8295cbe1-a7c5-4a35-a189-5d0bff51ede6@linux.intel.com/ > > Suggested-by: Jarkko Nikula > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Huang > > Reported-by: Dong Wang > > Tested-by: Dong Wang > > At first I thought that we need a Fixes tag, but on a second > thought I judged this more as a behavioural fix. Please, let me > konw if you think we want to have the Fixes tag here. > > Meantime, I'm going to re-arrange the tag section. It's common to > sort the tags in a chronological order: > > Reported-by: (it first gets reported) > Suggested-by: (then someone suggested the fix) > Signed-off-by: (then someone implemented the fix) > Tested-by: (finally someone tested it) > Link: (as reference) If you use `b4`, you may configure it to do this automatically and keep nice with contributors :-) -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko