From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0806C13A27E; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 15:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727451912; cv=none; b=Q+7nEaatssTGIcT+essQ7/hKS8jtYvfzfaeYmxMnrQD9ZZBDCMxV7HA0pyALTrSZKcyD45ws/K/cqZ0hGIPPOiHCSgC5vF9QL3NfQaLCsKKVfwAU4H+Qm4S4NW2TxMxZIbjkBr4qQyaKJw+Q4MBhyx2nhqs7UKdqCPkK9sxTbW8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727451912; c=relaxed/simple; bh=SSsVxrLU3Pis+OTeEMtEhV8WM8q9d22wDjApC2JZH7A=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=U+bwZWVJs1ZUDjJeY8mQfTiGWODKZ3O8P4Z/ZIYnWDSn6ahwZYql2gw5woKxZ2Oq2g/gvcbCITGE75ok3lZLqqz2gNaP3x5SqTPEnHu0nOiVLK1IHh+CRTMVlvae07uF9fQwAjvIKUimU/4UnhI6va9LP/Rsvh9zpsGYhwNRZl0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nXeJm1nF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nXeJm1nF" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1727451911; x=1758987911; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=SSsVxrLU3Pis+OTeEMtEhV8WM8q9d22wDjApC2JZH7A=; b=nXeJm1nFfOVPWrGhZr8aWN4dFc7W3IrcLCrDCKBDRebF4Abaagmmz5j3 IgvSs0RXTZrMLK9iwNqLcLgL8sNotshTgkPOe4PbPAf0BGLt30URxm7px KvBFUFh4zRVUcEP+ABAAKClK+/YWtay5Gc/T5JHYu/a69YYW7v6OnfUrA 0s3KmdMcEs9Z6v0eNuGAY0gvmao/vcjhsODClvhpmCT6Tr3C/2ZFAjnUG kGbC2ASIYgEohhhyvXT6PdnTVgVXi2K2oAbKSPg2QkSdfRApY+SP6DE/7 6xxFbYNce/cUSBlHg05C4RM7jDBRFpdBKjCdrnO+HTppWOegx8Bh8VK4x Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: RsSAabRYRNmdjarxKmBbbw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: afu+NoIJTP2rSdKsjObx4A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11208"; a="49127540" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,159,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="49127540" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 27 Sep 2024 08:45:09 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: v6pwkCoWT26fhaC+l2LbaQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: RXhXG783Sk+Jd0tNY9ukUQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,159,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="72992038" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by orviesa007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2024 08:45:08 -0700 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1003) id EE52330D; Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:45:06 +0300 (EEST) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2024 18:45:06 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Andi Shyti Cc: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c , lkml Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] i2c-host-fixes for v6.12-rc1 Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Fri, Sep 27, 2024 at 12:09:36PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote: ... > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > The DesignWare driver now has the correct ENABLE-ABORT sequence, > ensuring ABORT can always be sent when needed. > > In the SynQuacer controller we now check for PCLK as an optional > clock, allowing ACPI to directly provide the clock rate. > > The recent KEBA driver required a dependency fix in Kconfig. > > The XIIC driver now has a corrected power suspend sequence. While tag message looks nice here, I think it still has to follow the same (as in the commit message) pattern, i.e. $SUMMARY ...blank line... $DESCRIPTION Why? Because the Web representation of the message looks weird on the Web. Compare https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pinctrl/intel.git/tag/?h=intel-pinctrl-v6.12-1 and yours https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/andi.shyti/linux.git/tag/?h=i2c-host-fixes-6.12-rc1 -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko