From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0EBB51AC458; Mon, 4 Nov 2024 11:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730719238; cv=none; b=Rkdo7zIYIZcRImbfCZiKR8bBfJg345Acf9px6La5FNFRBMGaxtjrsdi/QkxAvuODC9qD/IWRtEh3K2pYebgWa7BtmzRjeP71vl0PzCrHcSWqnY91pb/WCmrCvw47K6+DHW9vNFQ7iKHkuhO99QzVCqRwPOOT5JPAxBGqZpEuOcw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730719238; c=relaxed/simple; bh=VKU/tb7DYOTetaqBJlKR839RYdQxIBWMEDaJYFJAMVc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=YqJ3Nso7ggjoeobeeanTPsjta8qPLBWJsHHAsVwBhTp4ePqx2uPIUybsCNIWoJHdQ52fbBCTZy1hP0a1cwy9kIHC+f0rAT4yZoDuF8/NZOffFCLIwp4DAyRTWn2+Pfct0+RSU0Bk9Qcap/9FZqeJven2XZsUZgFD/ITqlMbV7MU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=n7VSrnfM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="n7VSrnfM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1730719237; x=1762255237; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=VKU/tb7DYOTetaqBJlKR839RYdQxIBWMEDaJYFJAMVc=; b=n7VSrnfMxQX9pHYF6qQyeDYQ4itdh4wnbgoWMAQxfJP8yDHG+OniVpwD fEIwBHOggo79UZHdgR3D64u0zlb9x5mARliZwnnSEg6rf57tkdw4qDdy1 VyKEq8hkn1D9k7TxW/GNy8WILmdGXv542fv0ooKz/nu+l6xYBJRd1ZgAj UnfmjYtJOoxN28h2e7+n9Q56Pmd04WcVx7KYbfOyDz5+uMA76Fwv5VcDa 8EwaYlVZvWIcmy8/V4rjV+zpi3aE9duy81NqN7ltRCwNw1q6lQVPBsfWw aZL/KAFgWj5Zp9mZGKbgyHxiRtGv40HUCsxQLoim2yRwuF4b0CTGlnD+b w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: nneO+gDnQ7aK3vpLog1/YA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: ZwqAeuDFR1eezxR6132v4g== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11222"; a="30264694" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,199,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="30264694" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2024 03:20:36 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: vaZRDFczT9+pICghNuC+Vg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: bZE0rVAxTU6ytFwy3A6aZw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,256,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="88199494" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.154]) by fmviesa004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Nov 2024 03:20:35 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98) (envelope-from ) id 1t7v8K-0000000B26W-1Zfg; Mon, 04 Nov 2024 13:20:32 +0200 Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 13:20:32 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Wolfram Sang , Chen-Yu Tsai , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: Use *-y instead of *-objs in Makefile Message-ID: References: <20241018150337.2182181-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 01:05:20PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > Shouldn't be separated commit anyway? > > Can be argued. I have an evidence for my side: LKP complained as my (thanks to be a separate) patch unveiled the issue in the Kconfig there. Meaning that required a new version of the change, while the core part is not affected anyhow. > This patch applied to for-next, thanks! Thank you! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko