From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hans de Goede Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: acpi: Do not create i2c-clients for LNXVIDEO ACPI devices Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 14:50:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20170704124613.14591-1-hdegoede@redhat.com> <20170704124927.GB5057@katana> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:57408 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752159AbdGDMuo (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2017 08:50:44 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170704124927.GB5057@katana> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-i2c-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Jarkko Nikula , Len Brown , Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org Hi, On 04-07-17 14:49, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> + static const struct acpi_device_id video_device_ids[] = { > > What about naming the array 'ignored_device_ids' to be more generic? Sure I can do that, any other remarks before I send a v3 ? Regards, Hans