Re: [PATCH v2] Docs: Fixes link to I2C specification

[Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>]

On 11/21/21 9:46 AM, Deep Majumder wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>> On 11/18/21 10:14 PM, Deep Majumder wrote:
>>> The link to the I2C specification is broken and is replaced in this
>>> patch by one that points to Rev 6 (2014) of the specification.
>>> Although `https://www.nxp.com" hosts the Rev 7 (2021) of this
>>> specification, it is behind a login-wall and thus cannot be used.
>>
>> I don't quite get the "cannot be used" part.
>> I created a free login and downloaded this spec,
>> so yes, it's a hassle, but why can it not be used?
> 
> Perhaps a more appropriate wording would be "cannot be used as the only
> source of the spec"? Because as I understand, many users may be
> unwilling to sign up to a website just to download a spec sheet (if for
> no other reason, for the fear of spam).

To be clear, I think that what you have added in the summary.rst
file is fine, but the commit message is too strong IMO.

I would  just say something like
(or you could just add: cannot "easily" be used):

   Although `https://www.nxp.com" hosts the Rev 7 (2021) of this
   specification, it is behind a login-wall and thus cannot easily be used,
   while Rev 6 (2014) is readily available without requiring registration
   and login.

>>> Thus, an additional link has been added (which doesn't require a login)
>>> and the NXP official docs link has been updated. The additional link is
>>> not the Wayback Machine link since it seems that the PDF has not been
>>> archived.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Deep Majumder <deep@fastmail.in>
>>> ---
>>>    Documentation/i2c/summary.rst | 8 +++++---
>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst b/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
>>> index 136c4e333be7..3395e2e46d9c 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/summary.rst
>>> @@ -11,9 +11,11 @@ systems.  Some systems use variants that don't meet branding requirements,
>>>    and so are not advertised as being I2C but come under different names,
>>>    e.g. TWI (Two Wire Interface), IIC.
>>> -The official I2C specification is the `"I2C-bus specification and user
>>> -manual" (UM10204) <https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/user-guide/UM10204.pdf>`_
>>> -published by NXP Semiconductors.
>>> +The official I2C specification (revision 7) is the `"I2C-bus specification and user
>>> +manual" (UM10204) <https://www.nxp.com/webapp/Download?colCode=UM10204&location=null>`_
>>> +published by NXP Semiconductors. However, you need to log-in to the site to
>>> +access the PDF. An older version of the specification (revision 6) is available
>>> +`here <https://www.pololu.com/file/0J435/UM10204.pdf>`_.
>>>    SMBus (System Management Bus) is based on the I2C protocol, and is mostly
>>>    a subset of I2C protocols and signaling.  Many I2C devices will work on an

thanks.
-- 
~Randy