public inbox for linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com>
Cc: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@renesas.com>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
	linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com>,
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com>,
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com>,
	Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] i2c: riic: Implement bus recovery
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2025 10:53:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAITBfrOI0GAhGRA@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+V-a8tmTqFi4iqGhR3cfUgKw7mxJrm6ixGAHq747ptrL3t2jA@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 421 bytes --]


> Thanks, that did the trick. The incomplete_write_byte test case is
> passing for me. Now moving onto the incomplete_address_phase case this
> seems to be failing on my side. Did you test this on your side?

Well, frankly, this is the only test I tried and, yes, it did work for
me. Will check 'incomplete_write_byte' later today. I will also check if
I need to run the tests more often. I did not do an endless loop.


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-18  8:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-07 12:18 [PATCH v8] i2c: riic: Implement bus recovery Prabhakar
2025-04-17  8:31 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-17 13:10   ` Lad, Prabhakar
2025-04-17 20:12     ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-18  8:13       ` Lad, Prabhakar
2025-04-18  8:53         ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2025-04-23  8:26           ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-24 10:42             ` Lad, Prabhakar
2025-04-25  9:14               ` Wolfram Sang
2025-04-30 14:19                 ` Lad, Prabhakar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aAITBfrOI0GAhGRA@shikoro \
    --to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=chris.brandt@renesas.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea.uj@bp.renesas.com \
    --cc=fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com \
    --cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com \
    --cc=prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox