From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94809F9E6; Fri, 2 May 2025 14:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746195414; cv=none; b=rIklYbN04weNhZDR3nUerp6cTeLzbe9OLBzbxOZKCGAwth4w+IhIIWW013WjfeskdiqXfTtfDnXk4k7gVLADpvdtEY/qOf2qyR2fZ2eUXOeKQ4fGaYaGd4G3LXKRT/SAwwGiBnkTUhCymCofTv8t6s1AQvEQ3NpvEsJigPk5Vp4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746195414; c=relaxed/simple; bh=t9FXKQ1UQjaYAc38Pie7//F7ZLRLqk9CIKyBaPO20rU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dr5LnalrlVzraQ/Hb5K50lccsx+D0E21p6S7aYWxVTRswJthWW//v5FQMp5/ziJyW3237H4uoZTUB/V/PybJoNte0iF26EZMiIQKioG8TbxtyE3nb8ptcztMYS7TWJlyzMvOSpsyINPymHy+SCchP8ZkTNUhglvYvi5gqOKPvro= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=d8lg3kup; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="d8lg3kup" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1746195412; x=1777731412; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=t9FXKQ1UQjaYAc38Pie7//F7ZLRLqk9CIKyBaPO20rU=; b=d8lg3kupX9MCNFFh/bB96enBWATa2B0YuUBVzVMb1EyvUP9f0JllAb/n bHeBQwiI8pcbEgkNoLiNODF+F1tGMvXvif076nMwru3qffdRMGNlvxU2A dR1kziv0Ikoy7y51m7XHRtMBHv2xKV/DyphUtZ8AjdrFRw2iLWUcyx7nK jjqyiPcjQ2MAUiPgFdkCZKM/W02jHTCuBxSC6qqGuu/UWKnpiisjQSu6N u/2cXloyEAKFRSbQsreK2o2JF/xeMs6wzurfirBZTCnlZoHGw+z0dLB0V NQ5uyEg9nb9KHgOyts6moykUNisaTGY3Llyy7jZtNXs436ePBBOfOV8+v Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HuQw1u9XRKe81HiHnkTH3g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: i6cn4aRYRK+3TPVs1ESBGw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11421"; a="70379872" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,256,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="70379872" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 May 2025 07:16:52 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Dku17J5JTUK2BUvuWm/Xeg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: o6rVGY5lT9ixb6Za1Ni2yQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,256,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="134960659" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.55]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 May 2025 07:16:51 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uArC4-00000002Do2-2wl6; Fri, 02 May 2025 17:16:48 +0300 Date: Fri, 2 May 2025 17:16:48 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: core: Propagate all possible errors when requesting recovery GPIOs Message-ID: References: <20250212163701.2407540-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:44:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 06:37:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > If GPIO is available but we can't get it by some other, than deferred probe, > > reason, propagate it to the caller. > > > > No functional change since i2c_register_adapter() still cares only about > > deferred probe. > > Any comment on this? It's a month passed without any reaction... Yet another ping... -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko