From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CD2C1E5B7B for ; Mon, 19 May 2025 11:19:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747653548; cv=none; b=MDwCkzLTKdYynV2zJJxiiTK413Mv0T1lVffAd9DKaPla1Lh0ooUKBUXluAVoEQEWR3QFoL3066kQ9W8si5P0FYGVYKKwiSrjQyXtKe1AqStdi2ua3x9tnGpBNkxQOHrc/nyyBKXwJGGeDPDSKtgVlGOzGwM6j/9z9QMT/iswZpI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747653548; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kOWXMSfFvP8AU8Pmm5Qesbcxs1DttqSoV+HoRYnp66o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=DyWsdg37xrdx14qpvSGGWjTW0sEZdKVKfWO8/afC33MEz5BtzfeGdQFaMo/Ijc6GKSAZIw4wAbXIQlkjaMWTeo2mfRrSwzFlbCDjpcalXa6ZEOdFcmREkW2Y1u2pE7AJkvIarbD8EemrcHp5nPKHSgRU4k/H6DiREOKPmPknaQ0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=JrtfPTun; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="JrtfPTun" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1747653547; x=1779189547; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=kOWXMSfFvP8AU8Pmm5Qesbcxs1DttqSoV+HoRYnp66o=; b=JrtfPTunrBFfUBFSbhgOP9EM7VA4tR1hF6sVZDCeHF9WYuAY4dc2nz8/ vHl6oaflIbY/h60910rA51AjFWYDOLQ1qTTg/vv6PTcMU74vUdRGg9cyT LFD2O4qnVhEwQ7WMR+ePBp3P3zH94ZDRv/xiekpNsvA12/bae1FQVXKg6 WkQgYcOr85CyX4Q3POEvEB+8Xo1jxLD6z4UKlOEugkuhLVi37SVYVXer5 pareHPXOgqQa1UwDTRQR84jlX+DmPMEFdaKmqVANjg37woaJYtJ/Pn4lf 2Z1nFyF218w90R+WagoofCs1AQq78kmIhIKI8V3Oibz8kpgZ49Lw7mqhu g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 77wRKKrfRXCgL+ZNivCWzg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 6b4/io0vQ4qvIvS6Sk8oiw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11437"; a="53346136" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,300,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="53346136" Received: from fmviesa007.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.147]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2025 04:19:06 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: NNfcGKStTNy9rROuAKZG7Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: seqsBHIJTnSKDoCSteDTLg== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.15,300,1739865600"; d="scan'208";a="139381866" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by fmviesa007.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 May 2025 04:19:04 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uGyWL-0000000311M-3PbE; Mon, 19 May 2025 14:19:01 +0300 Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 14:19:01 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Wolfram Sang Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Andi Shyti , Christophe Leroy , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Madhavan Srinivasan , Michael Ellerman , Naveen N Rao , Nicholas Piggin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] i2c: remove 'of_node' from i2c_board_info Message-ID: References: <20250519111311.2390-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250519111311.2390-5-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Mon, May 19, 2025 at 01:13:11PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > I promised Andy to support him in his cleanup efforts, and here is the > outcome for tidying up i2c_board_info. It seems it was easier than > anticipated. But my scanning scripts (awk, coccinelle) didn't find any > more occurences and the build bots are happy, too. It really seems this > is all that is left to do. No complaint, though. Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko