From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10CDE262D14 for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2025 10:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751020312; cv=none; b=fWGa7hNn9ZUbj92n+c/bjvMuu/1MH0HNpb0K15zjKs4lX/z4hT2AZLUo2ofNjfZQJyRUcIXp+wJLrgxjyKjWM+KlbqEpfnKjEljHgnejqs6SEW+d/zRyvEuWnpYaFD4i67lT0D1sE3XiklzA5QLOVcl6HiZK8fwxsNIDz1Zu7+o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1751020312; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UNpZ3FeVZSvkZA9sSSV65o6uo4BPpcch9WQyiYk8qns=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rT5IBwPSfQbA4jNaAEKWCB82c5sX+KUTa11t+T04Mp9AP/wGyHj0IuBJtrNHVW31hoNgVr5h4nmBtTKE57Drma4/CGttf01Sbf1I2x4XodcdfP3G53X3AWG9qXfbeJkeSptxHCHb3we4DyjP6H1Oantcj1PIl0EyXyviNiGNdDY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=ehkXgSfD; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="ehkXgSfD" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=Pdto B2fLiH/LE1HGtoWY8dhCiyMSGf1v1rk5ANx6UNI=; b=ehkXgSfDFbX/XztMuoLY DZ+8o4l/H02gt+DX7n3Jl79ucniJUM/zn0R4twBf0u4flV7sJQoWdqhEVGIn6pBZ FmzRJDqKY49W5Ekg6j+hp9j7X8tjQtRPA9M9H+JNeGP0qLPhxrTYrQMo1ODZPYD8 of2hjTMS48NyryQjfV08k+vwrYALpCmrELjC5fzvLETGNoUbJx2yOPSnRCreY+FS IOpUnwuKy9X4pASX7a8+Z362jX7d5FnnTeT1IJAYtxVH1hQOUdS8SzJwrV4kYlHt LK61ShKKF5avS5zkEhz9a/fxVRZk/pc4UMUSCU/z7M+jvyuFnd3+jhoC+wp6Wyte oQ== Received: (qmail 1426905 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2025 12:31:48 +0200 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with UTF8SMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 27 Jun 2025 12:31:48 +0200 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@LvVvL4s4KJMgAwDPXzuUAOCQSK0rM+sw Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 12:31:47 +0200 From: Wolfram Sang To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, Andi Shyti , Johannes Berg , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: i2c: Geode ACCESS.bus depends on HAS_IOPORT Message-ID: References: <20250606075651.10883-2-johannes@sipsolutions.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250606075651.10883-2-johannes@sipsolutions.net> On Fri, Jun 06, 2025 at 09:56:52AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > From: Johannes Berg > > It already depends on X86_32, but that's also set for ARCH=um. > Recent changes made UML no longer have IO port access since > it's not needed, but this driver uses it. Build it only for > HAS_IOPORT. This is pretty much the same as depending on X86, > but on the off-chance that HAS_IOPORT will ever be optional > on x86 HAS_IOPORT is the real prerequisite. > > Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann > Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg Applied to for-current, thanks!