From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-6.16-rc3
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2025 11:25:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aFvAlSQICukBzt7K@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjCznJeOUSHcR5BszEUVv5BW6heO6jMX38MHXNaL3kbmQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 792 bytes --]
Linus,
> If you do conversions after the merge window, make them DAMN OBVIOUS.
> Make them minimal, make them automated, and DO NOT DO OTHER RANDOM
> CRAP AROUND THEM.
Okay, I don't want to do annoying things, so let me rephrase what I got
out of this. I should have 2 cleanup patches, one for the callback
changes and one for the whitespace changes?
Because I think the whitespace patch is needed. This is still the
beginning of a larger refactoring and having struct members initialized
according to coding style will greatly simplify next steps. And this
paragraph should then be the commit message of the whitespace patch.
I assumed that it was obvious that everything in this pull request was
automated. I honestly really don't enjoy pushing whitespaces around
manually.
Wolfram
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-25 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-22 13:20 [PULL REQUEST] i2c-for-6.16-rc3 Wolfram Sang
2025-06-22 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-25 9:25 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2025-06-25 15:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2025-06-22 19:55 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aFvAlSQICukBzt7K@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox