Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] i2c: PCF8584: Fix debug macros defines of if statements

[Cezar Chiru <chiru.cezar.89@gmail.com>]

On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 04:46:47PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:

Hello Markus,

First I want to thank you for reviewing my patches and patchset and making
comments for me to improve my patches.

I am new to kernel hacking and this is the first patchset that I submit to
linux kernel. I'm doing my best to improve my work so that it can be 
accepted into the kernel tree.

> …> Change is necessary because …
> 
> Does anything hinder you to choose imperative mood for change descriptions?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17-rc5#n94

Sorry, I didn't understood the first time. I will try my best.

> 
> Would you occasionally care more also for word wrapping?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17-rc5#n658
> 

I will follow from now on the line wrapped at 75 columns.

>
> …> ---
> >  drivers/i2c/algos/i2c-algo-pcf.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> …
> 
> Some contributors would appreciate patch version descriptions.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/?q=%22This+looks+like+a+new+version+of+a+previously+submitted+patch%22
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.17-rc5#n310
> 

After I sent V2 of patchset I realized I didn't included changes after ---
marker line.

I will send V3 trying to apply your suggestions.

Best regards,
Cezar Chiru