From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F38FB2F616C; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 09:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756980001; cv=none; b=tqna3UIhVXQQT/PRzPAIRQebtJGjnxADbC+yQCNErve/oi7CW46MophPq19kAKRw6EiJCK4+6g7kqEqGAO+df+utd8F4H7DKaPyvPVbeiy9Vxy9fxvQ9X87JZuxKRNkvoXGP1oNk1X7rrwEYnuaTS6uvAa7OebJ8cT7kTmzig9w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756980001; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mi+9YZfREfl8bO0SgMMuARpKTRd8R4HxdIYJ2cUBdG8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ovgd/Ma81G28hUtwYIxV9lCbCWTVcKoY1/R5iZrOEMCr0qYW+yAqXZ9pcX6vnmptthfCfFVwyNb0NvmMpDw/JODRuEqxbOb4mjS52cptYHJwBdQhr5wUQI+8oMZ87W3vg/Ie4Y7kS5dzuwopzlFYuQAmAJ2U7IvImbTqRVXEow8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=G82B4FQQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.21 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="G82B4FQQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1756980001; x=1788516001; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=mi+9YZfREfl8bO0SgMMuARpKTRd8R4HxdIYJ2cUBdG8=; b=G82B4FQQTCvgovhR5S7GI6SYMjndTr668S73HQxhaAlls68uaOh3ROKS eru0B1Wpc22LY/mqxCzyJfE6C7BUiMqLHXD+PukFb5lSVXs8nProtiL6v B7/jxv0uw+Y5KUk0nPbCO1Osx8+jagjGWOzRCPgLngELfznssAO7v1nIm q3iAFlPWM8ZHYlfZKMPe3fWVc8dhAC8ttOI6+slog6GIrvUXwjCQv5lTI 0fapKG47xujWVonEiichJNXrIA3HhRdZ2SOx8y/sQQKWPM5RV5/IElBsW XrHGTN9YJWeMfZ9usTbTRoDDUV/tzxR9d/j3st8CIJ9gkIVeKrX6CYEaR g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: N7FBLycMQ3GxeDUekRxjOg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: rcqe6eU6TICt5c9Ud8tk4w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11531"; a="59230285" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.17,312,1747724400"; d="scan'208";a="59230285" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by orvoesa113.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Sep 2025 03:00:00 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: RM5IJwZ1Ql+otGJ4bKKJjQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: uuZKpFSCQJO8Q9v49ca8fw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,238,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="202696450" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by orviesa002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Sep 2025 02:59:56 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uu6ky-0000000BEeS-4A78; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 12:59:52 +0300 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 12:59:52 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Wolfram Sang Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois?= Lessard , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators Message-ID: References: <20250902190443.3252-1-jefflessard3@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 11:49:25AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > It might be good to have an immutable branch for me from i2c core. > > Wolfram, can you provide a such if no objections? > > Sure thing, I can do that. But there is still discussion on patch 1, so > I will wait for an outcome there. But it seems that the discussion can be implemented in a followup? I think we are not in hurry anyway, so let see if it settles down soon. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko