From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D29A2EC0A5; Thu, 4 Sep 2025 10:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756982293; cv=none; b=NCi82z11a0qBZA5Wo51NkpFQB4/zJrL47EznQqdX7IyUUpb6Y/VtVI0X8j9WuHVfPVt5gdCL6MRZy7pmU+x2MoJtvRXNAfjP3IXXCJ61M3d36DyCOTaA0PZFwasEM00Qkkibp1OCNds252pFy70FXEa3txosDflquc+89rUo20o= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756982293; c=relaxed/simple; bh=hbR0wEYWqKtbDdPg7UhqpitNbfCEpvynd8wZStnxc/w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=gNpamZtqdxsAGgzetItiAv100aQdcNoTz0GdacgnfXKk0zEH1D7UNopIJPlFsnhQY+goEGCknT85cYvRrmX/WYKkjXP3sK5LdrVn3FmUkqMeq9ipVXsEmuSHYbTmRoKd4gensT3+4ZWYZcv08Y2/EuliIMZRr47scz6g68YFPlQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=X4cUqCzI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="X4cUqCzI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1756982292; x=1788518292; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hbR0wEYWqKtbDdPg7UhqpitNbfCEpvynd8wZStnxc/w=; b=X4cUqCzIOxtb3mRvF5xQTzLPxUtRdBsWO6p9kjCKcdOdHVNUFiis/zCU xdt8qWbImmsYSJi50/nKBdLpxi28L4/BoSSMIsTnQUH6lPo6sYSomKSjh Bhf0NCG0W84Kr+dvU+kmc3xD0UOBsw03VDw9vz2R3CxzVoX+YgP5TCYK7 /Zo4EzIM+yjJivVonUzczfiYExc1a4eV8FsPTAAZMSzY7H13iWXwf9LVj U1+dvY1lOOS4MKHvrKzFBKU4hTA+dFhRPaPd4MZDYsqqXDG7m7LNhKnOd h7mH6ZFJNgJ3HeYTf2LYl414mqlnc2b4pyjbAZ+h4t6hCa1XuZHmFgTdF A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5B2SuVqxRwuBzyZbKkqVJQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: f8OI8b9MTCeWfxsDFnn8zA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11542"; a="76918202" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,238,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="76918202" Received: from orviesa001.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.141]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Sep 2025 03:38:11 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Uy3ajEFrSwqANOQewh/dNg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: H5emK1dER1OBz9xVq4Wz8A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,238,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="209039630" Received: from agladkov-desk.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO kekkonen.fi.intel.com) ([10.245.244.92]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 04 Sep 2025 03:38:07 -0700 Received: from kekkonen.localdomain (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by kekkonen.fi.intel.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 011FE11FCCF; Thu, 04 Sep 2025 13:38:05 +0300 (EEST) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2025 13:38:05 +0300 Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo From: Sakari Ailus To: Danilo Krummrich Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Wolfram Sang , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois?= Lessard , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators Message-ID: References: <20250902190443.3252-1-jefflessard3@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Hi Danilo, others, On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 12:13:53PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On Thu Sep 4, 2025 at 11:59 AM CEST, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 11:49:25AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > >> > >> > It might be good to have an immutable branch for me from i2c core. > >> > Wolfram, can you provide a such if no objections? > >> > >> Sure thing, I can do that. But there is still discussion on patch 1, so > >> I will wait for an outcome there. > > > > But it seems that the discussion can be implemented in a followup? > > If Sakari attempts the rework, and we can prove this doesn't regress existing > users, removing fwnode_for_each_available_child_node_scoped() in the context > of the rework again should be trivial. It would perhaps be trivial but in this case I really wouldn't add it in the first place: it's unused. Either way, feel free to add: Reviewed-by: Sakari Ailus > > Given that, I don't see a reason to stall people working with the existing > semantics of the API in the meantime. -- Regards, Sakari Ailus