From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CFE017C21E; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 06:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757917641; cv=none; b=R+5dCVx7J+fpkcsM6NRg0uYqfYKrW/PmBJiDFGD68AtZMnaLGFhpsOsXpT3I2Ji4Eete4KiqRM3ZmM+zpD6YWg5gBBKvRFEEr7ii267vMwCPGsbRbRzDAAP8rGYEyBj59Lijahn0Sxdyk/CaE2usOeQFHNrnRguCmBpsNDyqqqY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757917641; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+7q7jPwPjbSSzwQKlJbZwZyOv7o49lHFlmKWTQmST7I=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pzZT5z/dECeKUXe/e2fuG/kAy8F/cJn6CYhvrcz8cz6W3CtoE51nYBnZL7N9UQacNkI5WwixMqjXhIFF8wuZIYCg+5YdDd3IJnUaLtlXf6C7VEJLx0i4k19ZhQYZUpxzoj5WW9RAGutYgCuJUrx4+ZmO6aWshpuz2m/yLdmZ6fM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=f7YN58jf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="f7YN58jf" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1757917639; x=1789453639; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=+7q7jPwPjbSSzwQKlJbZwZyOv7o49lHFlmKWTQmST7I=; b=f7YN58jftqotJSVnEG60dss4GDctSbVxOyAsrEr83FBPob3j1RxDBuzs VFk6Tv+ZIiytuT8d/9A/6VUqQbusZowvHyN6elxHNmVkzQS/DTElN0k/D rACMrPU6Tb3iun6VokKXFcEjGbgej8jUpoTy2Cu8Mn+WL1xeTbnBZNlF5 Z2teddZI0IcW7vVAxdrHOT/yWRzDKOPpv+HnwjlBRg7N9cHZ71+tSSN5i OK9ggPEJyfVj6jpNgNXEJ+zQsln0u213C1o6BjQ3bE4Su+FbQjCqNTe8f uQ9pXV1ZAEH1xzrfn0qG3PKCWt8++c1GYzvJbe60dlG2KOi9VUBQ7ag2R g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 1KrFXFH5SaOzT0eQdNUvhw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: p22pNBjvQ2Gd3H5SuYO67Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11553"; a="63983218" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,265,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="63983218" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa106.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2025 23:27:18 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: UJtIKqY8Q7GBgKa5FWJW5Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +O4XCaT/TgKpHHXYIzO90A== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,265,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="174349205" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.51]) by orviesa007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Sep 2025 23:27:16 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uy2gC-000000036gJ-32Rl; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 09:27:12 +0300 Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 09:27:12 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Wolfram Sang Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jean-Fran=E7ois?= Lessard , Daniel Scally , Heikki Krogerus , Sakari Ailus , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Danilo Krummrich , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] device property: Add scoped fwnode child node iterators Message-ID: References: <20250902190443.3252-1-jefflessard3@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Sat, Sep 13, 2025 at 12:28:22AM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > It might be good to have an immutable branch for me from i2c core. > > > > > Wolfram, can you provide a such if no objections? > > > > > > > > Sure thing, I can do that. But there is still discussion on patch 1, so > > > > I will wait for an outcome there. > > > > > > But it seems that the discussion can be implemented in a followup? > > > I think we are not in hurry anyway, so let see if it settles down soon. > > > > I pushed out an immutable branch now: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wsa/linux.git i2c/immutable/scoped_fwnode_child > > > > Please have a look if I got the tags correct. Once confirmed, I will > > merge it into i2c/for-mergewindow and Andy can pull it as well. > > Andy, did you pull this immutable branch already? Me? No, not yet. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko