From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E8428152A; Mon, 19 Jan 2026 19:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768850187; cv=none; b=bLPp4IQJTmU7kQNgsfXJUSyoauLYN8+GRrbRwWgHkp4lNMG5pNaMWwPjJFBH4tiROGnkhV8+JgKAA/n+krKTF9VXgZGbqYh8DQdtstsJPDP+IwRBHyOdQFKHL7MJcYiuWKHgCMLsXhR4nUWFSl2NThb8+UqsOB8xcTXOWizRU/g= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768850187; c=relaxed/simple; bh=0k4zMM0xFGGI2gIsh4tNSUIORb9lsxxgZ/GDjdpUL/s=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UIpXR1LKq7/gOda04GCaZZVVlxcAaiTvgol35SrTYsS83fKFtd8SEGiF3SXLkR4pzFE0t1yruCAVGjA2qHM3SJhZ92VW2JIAABCAcixqj1ZI+YtwLghA4d4jnp/3CDv8aBInlubwRAugjS2EVB+1y7CvfzxUX3kl95J+R1GZgI0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=IEuICg+G; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="IEuICg+G" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1768850186; x=1800386186; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version: in-reply-to; bh=0k4zMM0xFGGI2gIsh4tNSUIORb9lsxxgZ/GDjdpUL/s=; b=IEuICg+GBmsrhhcldOdKLNS7ZkVu7z+oOXtzcAlbCXg9xTe9HzMMtiL9 RSFx3/dcjR1+80WdWKCqP5DhJZCNEMAgzcPVKUKlVmnlkKUFr339Sd40T HjzVP/qHJBDrhf1vyKSYtuQEvBxPbt6JFITExzTvHzyoT75LPbvXy0Cpu VTC/xsoaxQHUF0AyCcWhWkDMvzvmycn8dE+uxrMbq7BP5dQNWC11+0I5V yHoMAq5UXtfOvs/YiwMoi+E4DbNgqT0WPQIXek/PSOmO2g6GzfPgWus9M 0Fg6/f6moU5jJb6vuoQUlP6SGXfhKiooIm59ZNtt6kdluVxSGy+F+V/bL w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WqQ2OWqgQzuy6/gTNwZ29Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: cq1PifE0R4OLp6UxaJVugg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11676"; a="70226602" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,238,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="70226602" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by orvoesa108.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2026 11:16:25 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WjBAjbCpSvSiVHD4krQTfg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Xx3g2NzRR4yLmCizGxDodw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,238,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="205085137" Received: from egrumbac-mobl6.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.37]) by orviesa006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 19 Jan 2026 11:16:24 -0800 Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 21:16:21 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Wolfram Sang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] i2c: core: Propagate all possible errors when requesting recovery GPIOs Message-ID: References: <20250212163701.2407540-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, May 02, 2025 at 05:16:48PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 04:44:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 06:37:01PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > If GPIO is available but we can't get it by some other, than deferred probe, > > > reason, propagate it to the caller. > > > > > > No functional change since i2c_register_adapter() still cares only about > > > deferred probe. > > > > Any comment on this? It's a month passed without any reaction... > > Yet another ping... So, can this be applied or should I do something about it? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko