From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDC7C3A450A for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2026 10:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772621239; cv=none; b=VneUMEOwIQG3h3824Zl+vIrLheH4aES1ix33AWo4X15zujxbrkOfZSL5wgUE8P1VFYvOyb9WAsC59TRWW1ZnMRGtxDXz146Ub/PCHMDw9h1SbHp9pLDbN99+Nd6n5e/EsBZ76VURuU4EOJaLsmqlFohZn6BXUe6tw0NBd01szNE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1772621239; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qEkP6EvZgqPAWYyGozNhbcyrFFsyOM1IyjhBGTK5+9k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LpL6/Pte/AzF5MQnGP2EPh+wLsjvFtUzTbUX4vSet2lKg36JJjzuK1x+rv7epwmwZWCdeXReqkzxpvYxy9GSXccVuquQT301ax/N0C9IvkymtAqydVFzBvA2plqOufxhpijxMFyuuBhGlJ9tcpALFTvV0LPHh7ZNGmVfgAHwrco= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b=gbVyftsg; arc=none smtp.client-ip=194.117.254.33 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.b="gbVyftsg" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=JU4b 1xuhqzq7jdWkQKanWTwRR1a0T1se45ZjOeNqLXw=; b=gbVyftsg1hhfndvKPh68 16tZj5E0FOg2hl+66PfyCQNHkRqgXiXYuKXSubdrMJQwkPSW6I1FClbb6LyymboK fm2JQybw6gduzVUi9jpgFwOZzG/48kpAzpYqMZBJpZI5FIcF2KUhfMouYFDVKw4q Wn4xbrz2reulJQI83Nm32wOQgRj40hebkVXg9pjvORXXmrXKnVBbd3WmXqdU/zpR lFOCzEkuaeuioAX8SqxqjPAeY+na2Vk3uoELfuu6hdWWKh1Cdv+RyWCdWyYE8xFH 019JYpRSWAqFLDI+epCVc45rZXoV/kaU+Zdff7QnpwLhxWtPzzcSMy8vUhhd4sGn zA== Received: (qmail 695206 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2026 11:47:10 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 4 Mar 2026 11:47:10 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@Tci9ijBManFtKXG7 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2026 11:47:09 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Andreas Kemnade Cc: Frank Li , Linus Walleij , Patrice Chotard , Florian Fainelli , Dave Stevenson , Bartosz Golaszewski , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Niemi Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-core-base: fix devicetree alias handling Message-ID: References: <20260302-i2cfix-v1-1-a95418e9217e@kemnade.info> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s4uJeZTSU1o5OHTU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260302-i2cfix-v1-1-a95418e9217e@kemnade.info> --s4uJeZTSU1o5OHTU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andreas, Bart, all On Mon, Mar 02, 2026 at 06:04:42PM +0100, Andreas Kemnade wrote: > Parent device is not set up there, so use the new of_node pointer to > handle aliases. >=20 > Fixes: 0ab80451c70f ("i2c: allow setting the parent device and OF node th= rough the adapter struct") > Reported-by: Kalle Niemi > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/EDF3FB58-4747-442E-8463-6F1C6E568962= @gmail.com/ > Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade Thank you a lot for this fix! I will apply the patch. Plus, I want to describe what it also made me do. Bart's patches are in for-current and were planned to be sent to Linus as an "after -rc1 cleanup". This patch tells me that we are not there yet and the patch series should have a full cycle in -next, so we (read: I) have more trust that we didn't overlook side-effects. As a conclusion, I will move Bart's patch series to for-mergewindow and apply your patch on top of it. Bart, I am sorry for the delay it introduces, but I think the smoother the transition the better. Maybe we can save some time somewhere else? Happy hacking, Wolfram --s4uJeZTSU1o5OHTU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEOZGx6rniZ1Gk92RdFA3kzBSgKbYFAmmoDakACgkQFA3kzBSg KbaKwhAAh7IHhg+lHafQ6oo0oHwFmr4BO3b1XqA4xtCaOGaF/gAHpm1lz3QNHGzX ZdTUKOkHtIdpJNo7/YWjFwDBpCWSfiiWsdo9IUlIPugCfBGdh3hhAGIjCpXihQL6 nfgn2A202JxaduHEIP+4qG/FtJ3mko96Ohd0aidlY3x0CUYzu+6E2Klb8wizbEG/ tyAos5YB6468gJNyOwawb4Lj9aZSPpwZIvw5k1k8w7GoRdcvkt+1Rf2QZ311Zlvd SJIZZzaP8GA38Xfu9Q+xfgqOOx7TJeS8GwTOB9Dtc0awHPr1TDPPzvA2Y5mSlQQu dQk4GKyTu7rhPEvMG+bhwPYfo4vEEVKQbdzx/Gyt6tvtSrzell8k2vt3GAW28pCE 0rOaHgDNeoHajmsu8jAG0kYUew3LXxLprGdPjayCGO+zjqP2gJ1HeUcMtdOU3/PW o8CRbJD6pnhZzwzToakKze3XJs4ppH2Eqn2/Gb2U26yMtpiy6kMdspijGJAGWpqG AarRTsOwXUds/99LNCxFQKSHnY0qmLVRpZQDXHmW3rDWt5F5BqZeQ/PtHzv6NtIz T/1z9u/nAT2jjHpXh5dJ5BUr3Nj5RxkKq3LVRHI/VUCEWN0t8PSgPUp+DwvrsVmg F/zJu1JJ4t3P/mMNUK+JA4/vD4woRsN83lble6AlhN5P7nv/d8k= =OcbA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --s4uJeZTSU1o5OHTU--