From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA873271FD; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 06:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784270183; cv=none; b=GNM8E3WUoIFMVvo9NgP7vvtM83O6xqQS6HKXd3cR0hmYx+KRLjwIDbXMxv/lt+Hpk8Gf8nCESvGDD9MtFp4+U5tkeF5JLuwJ7WSmc6FactgmRyconugU1gFPbTUANqTOWVH/8kPMOSwO/4Pv/bwwzhiaPBbzf37sTt5UwB6k9uw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784270183; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rjl7eH0SjxnHywWD1iCcAg52I/wCkOiiFgnSzicmG9g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=A3THXe5F7vi5VvH+Tkx+RY03LJD0vRcFR2Y+ALI7+kcm2bce3ZfJTY6kOSxYcd4i4oNrBiXIqPqdkXWT4AeSJpAtBYt0SnknW/X2NvDxy4WbJLbo4q+ScfBnkcCzt/WFRQDx0Zt0MGZPY3is8IGKQCce8EjGRNyjBmJhuBdUl0Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=HLRS1lbT; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="HLRS1lbT" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1784270180; x=1815806180; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=rjl7eH0SjxnHywWD1iCcAg52I/wCkOiiFgnSzicmG9g=; b=HLRS1lbTyxarByUrfVmxeKHkR31JobKy6u40ZcJ5JWdK4Fc2mSZEuPCU rF248BuMXo3QbtOv8RTM/fHnwd7NLaIZI8rCRADKiX7QBKdhhL/cyoGp5 ojPCegjaBb5vcKgNU82w0jnuAD2Osm4fdPENrtoKAehC0iWEFqCFHOXF8 Q6MxAYUwLzF7u/KRMTLAKIOtw0PG4fpjg8g0SMzbTbrmJyRSfBzVXTNFq gk0J/6hgi0QHBmKnpwmf5ZWXerb1OGPc947V+Jf4p6SdMewAlqVZXNMCG KSOgOyV/PsCKuX9d5vfoNq7DKcccUX3JWwNUvoUhSnrSyErtZ1b6WpJJj Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: dhnRomo1QhCuAt7Bs8Scjw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 4T6ZFVH+Q5KmWxlwP37ZKA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11848"; a="84817391" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,168,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="84817391" Received: from orviesa006.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.146]) by fmvoesa111.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2026 23:36:20 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: g2A86zBcTIqgdAvZuAS+Vg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: gHquvPoBRJOuaAhv8Q7lFA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,168,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="254934785" Received: from pgcooper-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.143]) by orviesa006-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2026 23:36:17 -0700 Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 09:36:15 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Hardik Prakash Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, wsa@kernel.org, mario.limonciello@amd.com, brgl@bgdev.pl, basavaraj.natikar@amd.com, linusw@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org, chaitanya.kumar.borah@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v12] i2c: designware: defer probe if child GpioInt controllers are not bound Message-ID: References: <20260716113055.41319-1-hardikprakash.official@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 10:18:33AM +0530, Hardik Prakash wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jul 2026, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > It's utterly wrong patch. Actually this whole saga shows how AI wastes > > more time than gains a productivity. > > ... > > So, make sure v13 is a real patch. > > I am sorry for the bad patch. I will take some time to ensure all of > the feedback from v10, v11, v12 is properly incorporated and that v13 > is a proper patch. > > On Fri, 17 Jul 2026, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > But this is wrong. It's a patch over v11 (basically it's a diff v11..v12). > > For the next patch, should I carry the Ack over, given the underlying > content didn't change? I think due to this mistake you need to reset the tags. Let people review it again (and explain in the changelog why that happens). > On Fri, 17 Jul 2026 at 00:25, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 05:00:55PM +0530, Hardik Prakash wrote: > > So, make sure v13 is a real patch. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko