From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] I2C: SiByte: Convert the driver to make use of interrupts Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 02:26:54 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: References: <1291617494-18430-1-git-send-email-mattst88@gmail.com> <20101206173040.GA18372@ericsson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-i2c-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Matt Turner Cc: Guenter Roeck , Jean Delvare , "linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-mips-6z/3iImG2C8G8FEW9MqTrA@public.gmane.org" , Ralf Baechle List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Matt Turner wrote: > > =A0Matt, thanks for keeping your eye on these bits and reviving the= m; I've > > meant to do so for a long time now, but never came to it. =A0Please= note > > however, as I'm the original author, my original Signed-off-by mark= ups > > continue to apply and you should be quoting them with the submissio= ns. > > You should only add your own Signed-off-by annotation if you made a= ny > > changes and it would make sense to state what these changes were. >=20 > Sure thing. Will fix. For patches 2 and 3 of the other series, I don'= t > think I was ever 100% sure that you were the author, since they were > living on OpenWRT.org and I couldn't find them in any mailing list > archives. Can you confirm that these 4 patches are all yours? All the relevant submissions should be present here: http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2008-05/threads.html Specifically: http://www.linux-mips.org/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=3Dlinux-mips&i=3DPine.LNX.= 4.55.0805180447210.10067%40cliff.in.clinika.pl (5th of a series of 6), and: http://www.linux-mips.org/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=3Dlinux-mips&i=3DPine.LNX.= 4.55.0805070054440.16173%40cliff.in.clinika.pl (3rd of a series of 4), and: http://www.linux-mips.org/cgi-bin/mesg.cgi?a=3Dlinux-mips&i=3DPine.LNX.= 4.55.0805130353250.535%40cliff.in.clinika.pl (individual submission). The "clean up SWARM RTC setup" change seems to be modified (lacking e.g= =2E a=20 proper read_persistent_clock() implementation) compared to my proposal=20 (second above) and most likely came from someone else and the lm90 chan= ge=20 definitely comes from someone else. Note that for IRQ support you may have to investigate dependencies in = the=20 other two series as the patch (third above) was intended to apply on to= p=20 of the two series (select the date sort for easier identification of th= e=20 series). I'd have to dig into that code for further details and I cann= ot=20 afford the time right now, sorry. Maciej