From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To: Aniket RANDIVE <aniket.randive@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Mukesh Savaliya <mukesh.savaliya@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
Viken Dadhaniya <viken.dadhaniya@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] i2c: core: Add i2c_update_timeout() helper for dynamic transfer timeouts
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 22:23:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <amuy0mdHQlYCcRfb@shikoro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <be5ba8e8-15d0-4fe4-a66c-fe7ce8da6cc3@oss.qualcomm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 367 bytes --]
> Given the feedback so far, would maintainers prefer that if i drop the core
> helper entirely and keep the dynamic timeout calculation local to the
> qcom-geni driver or should we continue exploring an opt-in core-based
> approach?
Well, I suggested a potential way in my last mail (Kconfig option). So,
what do you think about it? Does it handle your use case?
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 20:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-20 11:41 [PATCH v6 0/2] i2c: Add dynamic transfer timeout based on message length and frequency Aniket Randive
2026-07-20 11:41 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] i2c: core: Add i2c_update_timeout() helper for dynamic transfer timeouts Aniket Randive
2026-07-22 5:25 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-07-24 11:46 ` Aniket RANDIVE
2026-07-26 20:11 ` Andi Shyti
2026-07-27 4:15 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-07-27 20:42 ` Andi Shyti
2026-07-28 4:56 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-07-28 9:42 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-07-28 10:14 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-07-29 15:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2026-07-30 11:53 ` Aniket RANDIVE
2026-07-30 20:23 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2026-07-20 11:41 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] i2c: qcom-geni: Add dynamic transfer timeout based on transfer length and frequency Aniket Randive
2026-07-22 5:26 ` Mukesh Savaliya
2026-07-24 11:51 ` Aniket RANDIVE
2026-07-22 5:25 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] i2c: Add dynamic transfer timeout based on message " Mukesh Savaliya
2026-07-24 11:56 ` Aniket RANDIVE
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=amuy0mdHQlYCcRfb@shikoro \
--to=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
--cc=aniket.randive@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mukesh.savaliya@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=viken.dadhaniya@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox