Linux I2C development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Ahmad Byagowi <ahmadexp@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] i2c: mux: Propagate software nodes to channel adapters
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2026 09:11:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ao_VE0W-FohWqPPt@ashevche-desk.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOQiBWNVvHpO7X8yWyZEa3-nV76YJfRbkzo+_4U-upEj4VNfow@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 08:29:47AM -0700, Ahmad Byagowi wrote:
> Hi Peter, Andy,
> 
> Yes, software-node handling is needed for the ptp_ocp use case.

That driver is a mess. I'm surprised nobody told to the authors of
the respective changes to look at the auxiliary implementation.

> ptp_ocp is a PCI driver. It creates its board-specific I2C topology at
> runtime with software nodes: the mux, its channel nodes, sensors, and LED
> controller. Firmware does not provide ACPI nodes for this topology.
> 
> The existing acpi_preset_companion() path only associates a mux adapter
> with an existing ACPI child. It does not associate the adapter with one of
> these dynamically created software-node channel nodes. Without that
> association, i2c_get_adapter_by_fwnode() cannot find the channel adapter by
> the channel software node, so ptp_ocp cannot instantiate the downstream I2C
> devices on the correct channel.
> 
> Does this address the concern, or would you prefer a different way to
> represent this dynamically created topology?

Wouldn't it be possible to use some kind of DT overlay to have that?

> Thanks, Andi, for taking the first patch into i2c/i2c-fixes. I will drop it
> from the next revision and rebase the remaining two patches once this
> question is resolved.

> On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 10:50 PM Peter Rosin <peda@lysator.liu.se> wrote:
> > Den Sun, Aug 23, 2026 at 09:34:38AM -0700, skrev Ahmad Byagowi:
> > > Device Tree channel nodes are associated with the adapters created by
> > > i2c-mux, but equivalent software-node descriptions are not.
> > >
> > > Use generic firmware-node operations for the existing channel lookup and
> > > accept either an OF node or a software node. Associate the returned node
> > > with the adapter so child I2C devices can be instantiated from
> > > software-node properties.
> > >
> > > Save the adapter firmware node before adapter deletion and release the
> > > reference afterwards, following the lifetime pattern in i2c-atr.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-27  6:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-23 16:34 [PATCH v7 0/3] i2c: mux: Propagate software nodes to channel adapters Ahmad Byagowi
2026-08-23 16:34 ` [PATCH v7 1/3] i2c: mux: Fix channel node leak on adapter add failure Ahmad Byagowi
2026-08-25  5:49   ` Peter Rosin
2026-08-23 16:34 ` [PATCH v7 2/3] i2c: mux: Factor out channel node lookup Ahmad Byagowi
2026-08-25  5:50   ` Peter Rosin
2026-08-23 16:34 ` [PATCH v7 3/3] i2c: mux: Propagate software nodes to channel adapters Ahmad Byagowi
2026-08-25  5:50   ` Peter Rosin
     [not found]     ` <CAOQiBWNVvHpO7X8yWyZEa3-nV76YJfRbkzo+_4U-upEj4VNfow@mail.gmail.com>
2026-08-26 16:39       ` Ahmad Byagowi
2026-08-27  6:11       ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2026-08-30  4:55         ` Peter Rosin
2026-08-30  5:10           ` Ahmad Byagowi
2026-08-31  7:13             ` Peter Rosin
2026-08-31  7:28               ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-31  7:22           ` Andy Shevchenko
     [not found]           ` <CAOQiBWOZd+NVRqzRzJx9HP+B21JJXBUTy_OxAqDw8X7tvWeY+w@mail.gmail.com>
2026-08-31  7:25             ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-08-26 13:45 ` [PATCH v7 0/3] " Andi Shyti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ao_VE0W-FohWqPPt@ashevche-desk.local \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=ahmadexp@gmail.com \
    --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peda@lysator.liu.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox