From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=194.117.254.33 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794341188; b=rgHhVb9MzfcPR8lK2MBuHiM+zpPbqex7bqoKlEXD5ysLOLxQGGPkAuLdAYkyQW6J7IrV gQfUhDMk/6PTEiMbvpr7LJLhkvjXzgKIz3We0k/qURcF238LqyD46jrmJ+itm78zBLIfk tbjIHShhmx99N+aolWCMszMV/gm/E0zWtx/LsCtKLzLeNUR8xRqUnd2Cy/BzS0bVURz9s GsI7zIpJ67vcRWvmG+slSnYEaY6uYt4tIY6IR3JVbCLjYDQo3aPVrlM0o020BW8ddbgn6 b5YooAOoY9xoNQGgNmINRWVz5BYMTPl0rWeRRdmC0LwSB6FGgtHVYIAt+aV7BSy/Ccw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794341188; h=DMARC-Filter:DKIM-Signature:Received:Received:X-UD-Smtp-Session:Date: From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; bh=alD3fGtjQd9CCc7M7nbOuP3nu43HinJ6Imab9qhCwWk=; b=kcEP/UCiZhwkrBNtt1eDk8/UwgnZqzWnwAmvd/RUHlqV3ZwsJN1PiFvmwXZKqGnj9g+g sWKq8giWFT805V+YPOWmeut7sHuSkSDYetWf9XkVGEsIM1Tjnf9QlHkuOtIjaxaEpfNdu Mn3AYUqk2/xP97q6gg00bliPZtWM1v1bz0fLh7XkE9FUfDgE5mYaF/IAsC9yJIY6am98x ZU4fiasNE31avnxa7WFEvzZaxLc2x6iMXpo39ZvZSTpjnEa9uClA0cVdrn9j3fIga0qG8 zRd5987EXudSwL+nCVQiCqcRViMi3vimatoxVKLsdvOg0eLaQbAOglPVRZXHCmSIsQQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none header.from=sang-engineering.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com; dkim=pass header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k1 header.b="H+BbA/2o"; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=194.117.254.33 Received: from mail.zeus03.de (zeus03.de [194.117.254.33]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3EC0606A323 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2026 20:06:26 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org F3EC0606A323 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sang-engineering.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=sang-engineering.com header.i=@sang-engineering.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=k1 header.b=H+BbA/2o DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= sang-engineering.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=k1; bh=alD3 fGtjQd9CCc7M7nbOuP3nu43HinJ6Imab9qhCwWk=; b=H+BbA/2o2lW/5M6/l8NT tW7m23UMVgUFK1pd62lc8xhVwor3DTtfyk4b1gtqwvkwJdUeyhzGUKAxU4bj74Qh YDB0ea/8aTh/r58NjJEib+8C76I/HX2NJArp22utwcj7zu65XZ2fMOD+FJtrF17x gTk+CJNH0Fe540MGbqpSn8m/48EsxeXglyn/YXRyIlUA/kS9rMsg41rQAvcaeJ/9 7VgTMZPMaVbz0YnFhBd31TXcyKPmrGVSu48tn11a1B5dH5flCYCIHVXpAY+SNiG8 GR8K2RKFr9VTcca7cxEOk+GYYXLKGYtaSns0L9QlWRImlnzFr44dlJejtiMK3rjI pA== Received: (qmail 352277 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2026 21:06:24 +0100 Received: by mail.zeus03.de with ESMTPSA (TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 encrypted, authenticated); 10 Nov 2026 21:06:24 +0100 X-UD-Smtp-Session: l3s3148p1@oH7qnPFfQNMujnsO Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2026 21:06:21 +0100 From: Wolfram Sang To: Johan Hovold Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Andi Shyti , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] i2c: dev: clean up registration Message-ID: References: <20260827102043.673273-1-johan@kernel.org> <20260827102043.673273-4-johan@kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: > If Wolfram insists, I can revisit this, but I don't think it's needed. Well, I can see both sides. One the one hand, it is a bit of an academic excercise, on the other hand it is more "correct". I favor the incremental approach. I won't force Johan to do something which he thinks is superfluous. But if someone interested sends such an incremental patch, I'd vote for inclusion. And with all the code analysis out there, I think such a patch will come eventually. That being said, it means I could then apply this series to my for-andi branch and add the comment I requested here myself. But I will wait until tomorrow to wait for further comments, if any.