Re: [PATCH 5/5] mfd: axp20x: Fix axp288 volatile ranges

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>]

Hi,

On 14-12-16 15:41, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 9:52 PM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
>> The axp288 pmic has a lot more volatile registers then we were
>> listing in axp288_volatile_ranges, fix this.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mfd/axp20x.c | 3 +++
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
>> index a294121..b9c1adf 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/axp20x.c
>> @@ -117,7 +117,10 @@ static const struct regmap_range axp288_writeable_ranges[] = {
>>  };
>>
>>  static const struct regmap_range axp288_volatile_ranges[] = {
>> +       regmap_reg_range(AXP20X_PWR_INPUT_STATUS, AXP20X_PWR_OP_MODE),
>
> Actually register 0x02 is volatile as well. Various fields say "write
> 1 to clear".
> You might need a new define for it though, as the usage is different.
>
>>         regmap_reg_range(AXP20X_IRQ1_EN, AXP20X_IPSOUT_V_HIGH_L),
>> +       regmap_reg_range(AXP22X_GPIO_STATE, AXP22X_GPIO_STATE),
>> +       regmap_reg_range(AXP20X_FG_RES, AXP288_FG_CC_CAP_REG),
>
> Could you also add AXP20X_TIMER_CTRL and 0xa0 ~ 0xa1 (real time
> battery voltage),
> if you're adding defines?

Hmm, ok, I'll do 2 new patches then 1 adding the defines and a v2
of this one. Lee, can you pick up 1 - 4 as they currently are
please? Then I'll just send these 2 new patches.

Regards,

Hans