From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27A431DE8B2; Wed, 6 Nov 2024 11:53:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730894002; cv=none; b=ez9yuYlXvDxWbM0uVWSLk2ABBjd1+DptiGTI0l3LtlcJCzvWFoto+bdz9fRrfMNX1Wn/KqFdxLv21P1fD9zxnjZytlD8Jjlv/rT+iSnMEXSwc3EemegdEaAutfo/Lxewt87JVeiysV64ob2Ay59U7nSueMIBV691zhNykY7DXqo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730894002; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PhQvnKePAoEA2kX1y16keIzj/ld0vsePlMe+JYHLDL4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=aU5DBLK6MqMPIvswl3Q8S1ve6jZ2smx4baunjw7a+okWcR+GTmM61mFuZwNXkmD+BcEqDO7rv9fa4Y1pyWKplNDb6034g+sic/JdV+tWX4+Ze5zIq4gLlyPM7oiOQo671rPdxb/eOyA3Ri3bEudDPJ0Q3xG60kiOCpg5UnvQKyA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=LWn/qJPG; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.17 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="LWn/qJPG" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1730894002; x=1762430002; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=PhQvnKePAoEA2kX1y16keIzj/ld0vsePlMe+JYHLDL4=; b=LWn/qJPGAX6K+iQOYM7dZS81dC8RfeBb+4kEm5zU2as6IXQimOvL7eKY BmfoxJlIj7xFxve84BvNIV8fEiLY5aETIPD17BLKEfUpCkRPNpKLFwjty R4t0odX5M2vY9IB99twgdd13LFie5G5mWI3PGXxbeF/2Vyg8rEFlCaKZf mte1j55tPvtVEZoSTwCf4yA+QrWkYEiP7VwOOb2WfK/FV2V4LNnfQAmhs eHqrJn+xRvj9y6bRZLKZDRw7r/lUGRC+XUDcT06hdSYGUB4VZmAVbIAAj F1OWExNzPzunm8PWW6hYYpqXGwd4A+hhSugbBPfJqas4THYIJySqYTis7 Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WgdiFrxjTcuJCoH6H2Jlzw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: tetSONq8QdWsT/d6KjE5fw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11247"; a="30800932" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,262,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="30800932" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by orvoesa109.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Nov 2024 03:53:21 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: AMFhg14FTReoSDMQUH5hQA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: DuKM7Sh9SM6mYO/bsImZDA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.11,262,1725346800"; d="scan'208";a="88464152" Received: from mylly.fi.intel.com (HELO [10.237.72.151]) ([10.237.72.151]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 06 Nov 2024 03:53:18 -0800 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2024 13:53:17 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND TO CC MAILLIST] i2c: designware: fix master holding SCL low when I2C_DYNAMIC_TAR_UPDATE not set To: Liu Peibao , Andi Shyti Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Mika Westerberg , Jan Dabros , "xiaowu . ding" , Angus Chen , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20241101081243.1230797-1-loven.liu@jaguarmicro.com> <3580ce2a-963b-4a50-98b5-52ecac43871c@jaguarmicro.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Jarkko Nikula In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/6/24 12:09 PM, Liu Peibao wrote: > On 2024/11/6 17:46, Andi Shyti wrote: >>> Fixes: 2409205acd3c ("i2c: designware: fix __i2c_dw_disable() in case master is holding SCL low") >>> Co-developed-by: xiaowu.ding >>> Signed-off-by: xiaowu.ding >>> Co-developed-by: Angus Chen >>> Signed-off-by: Angus Chen >>> Signed-off-by: Liu Peibao >> >> Thanks, this make much more sense now. >> >> Just one question, do we want to keep xiaowu.ding or Xiaowu Ding? >> Can I change it to the second way? It looks better and that's how >> it's normally signed. >> > > I have confirmed with Xiaowu, and that is surely okay. > Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula