linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy@infradead.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] i2c: Hookup typec power-negotation to the PMIC and charger
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 15:33:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <be26a8cd-e089-0997-2438-5f12ecd02988@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170904045645.fb6scegrypdodvfl@ninjato>

Hi,

On 04-09-17 06:56, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>> The first 2 patches are i2c patches, if you could review and
>> merge these (preferably for 4.14, but 4.15 is fine too) that would
>> be great.
> 
> Definately for v4.15 and I very likely won't be able to review them
> before rc1 or rc2 time, if even that. Sorry, but I2C core changes need
> extra careful review and I2C maintenance is largely done in my limited
> spare time.

Ok, I understand.

> If you could get other people to review/tag the patches,
> this would be very helpful.

FWIW althought the first patch is a core change it is not really a big
one and won't impact any existing drivers, but I fully understand
you still want to take your time to review it.

Andy (Shevchenko) can you perhaps take a look at the first patch
in this series and give your opinion on it ?

>> Darren, Andy, the single platform/x86 patch in here should only
>> be merged after the 2 i2c patches are in place, otherwise users
>> of the board(s) in question will end up not having any battery
>> monitoring. Also note that this patch applies on top of the
>> "[PATCH v2] platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Work around BIOS bug on some devices"
>> patch I send out yesterday.
> 
> Is that dependency for v4.14?

Yes that dep should make 4.14.

> Would it be an idea if I take the platform
> patch via the i2c tree then?

I've some other patches pending which require further changes to the
intel_cht_int33fe driver (*), so I think it would be best if the last
patch got merged through the platform/x86 tree. The dependencies
between patch 2-3 are runtime only (and not fatal if missing, just
inconvenient) so merging this to 2 separate trees should be fine
as long as both patches get merged for 4.15.

Regards,

Hans


*) The intel_cht_int33fe and i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc drivers together
instantiate 4 i2c devices which together make all the "magic" behind
the Type-C connector on these boards happen. The patch-series
completed by these 3 patches ties 3 of the 4 drivers together so
that charging and battery monitoring fully works. Ideally all 4
i2c-clients would be instantiated from a single place, e.g.
intel_cht_int33fe.c, but the charger is hooked up through a "child"
i2c bus on the pmic, which is where i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c
comes into play.

The next series adds support for the 4th chip, the type-c cross-switch/
mux which is necessary to get superspeed usb and/or displayport working
over the Type-C connector.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-09-04 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-03 12:41 [PATCH v4 0/3] i2c: Hookup typec power-negotation to the PMIC and charger Hans de Goede
2017-09-03 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] i2c: Allow overriding dev_name through board_info Hans de Goede
2017-09-03 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] i2c-cht-wc: Add device-properties for fusb302 integration Hans de Goede
2017-09-03 12:41 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] platform/x86: intel_cht_int33fe: Update fusb302 type string, add properties Hans de Goede
2017-09-04  6:27   ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-09-04 13:38     ` Hans de Goede
2017-09-04  4:56 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] i2c: Hookup typec power-negotation to the PMIC and charger Wolfram Sang
2017-09-04 13:33   ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2017-09-04 13:56     ` Wolfram Sang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=be26a8cd-e089-0997-2438-5f12ecd02988@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=andy@infradead.org \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).