From: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "De Marchi, Lucas" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com"
<mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"christian.ruppert@alitech.com" <christian.ruppert@alitech.com>,
"Souza, Jose" <jose.souza@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] i2c: designware: detect when dynamic tar update is possible
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2016 11:05:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c58ce503-580b-34b7-3489-7b8829f88dca@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1471356468.2907.4.camel@intel.com>
On 08/16/2016 05:07 PM, De Marchi, Lucas wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-08-16 at 17:00 +0300, Jarkko Nikula wrote:
>>> + */
>>> + reg = dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_CON);
>>> + dw_writel(dev, reg ^ DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER,
>>> DW_IC_CON);
>>> +
>>> + if ((dw_readl(dev, DW_IC_CON) &
>>> DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER) ==
>>> + (reg & DW_IC_CON_10BITADDR_MASTER)) {
>>> + dev->dynamic_tar_update_enabled = true;
>>> + dev_dbg(dev->dev, "Dynamic TAR update enabled");
>>> + }
>>
>> Is this possible to move to i2c_dw_probe()? I guess the enabled
>> status
>> doesn't change runtime?
>
> It was actually useful at this place during development of this patch
> because we could check any unexpected change in behavior when resuming.
> We did catch a bug because of this and fixed.
> I'm not sure if now it makes more sense to move to probe method. I'd
> leave it where it is, but I'm open to move it there.
>
Can you do a quick re-test that case to see does it change runtime? If
it does then this needs a comment why there is need to do this check
each time when HW is reinitialized. Otherwise there is chance someone
may move this code to probe time in the future.
--
Jarkko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-17 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-28 22:03 [PATCH v3 0/3] i2c: designware: improve performance for transfers Lucas De Marchi
2016-07-28 22:03 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] i2c: designware: wait for disable/enable only if necessary Lucas De Marchi
2016-08-16 13:59 ` Jarkko Nikula
2016-07-28 22:03 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] i2c: designware: detect when dynamic tar update is possible Lucas De Marchi
2016-08-16 14:00 ` Jarkko Nikula
2016-08-16 14:07 ` De Marchi, Lucas
2016-08-17 8:05 ` Jarkko Nikula [this message]
2016-08-17 12:48 ` De Marchi, Lucas
2016-07-28 22:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] i2c: designware: do not disable adapter after transfer Lucas De Marchi
2016-08-16 14:00 ` Jarkko Nikula
2016-08-12 14:59 ` [PATCH v3 0/3] i2c: designware: improve performance for transfers Christian Ruppert
2016-08-15 12:34 ` De Marchi, Lucas
2016-08-16 12:14 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c58ce503-580b-34b7-3489-7b8829f88dca@linux.intel.com \
--to=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=christian.ruppert@alitech.com \
--cc=jose.souza@intel.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).