From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarkko Nikula Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: designware: Fix regression when dynamic TAR update is disabled Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:48:57 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1486669851-25632-1-git-send-email-Nehal-Bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com> <1486670858.2133.436.camel@linux.intel.com> <1486676048.14478.4.camel@intel.com> <110f9081-ddba-82c2-6ba3-f92bc36d0bc3@amd.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <110f9081-ddba-82c2-6ba3-f92bc36d0bc3@amd.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Suravee Suthikulpanit , "De Marchi, Lucas" , "mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com" , "andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com" , "Nehal-Bakulchandra.Shah@amd.com" Cc: "wsa@the-dreams.de" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org" , "Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com" List-Id: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org On 10.02.2017 08:38, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote: > At this points, my understanding is there are probably two options here: > > 1) Keep the commit 63d0f0a6952a (i2c: designware: detect when dynamic > tar update > is possible) and apply V2 of this patch in 4.10. We might need to > back-port the change > to v4.9 stable as well. > > 2) Revert the 63d0f0a6952a (i2c: designware: detect when dynamic tar > update is possible) in 4.10, > and also in v4.9 stable as well. > I'm fine with both options. Maybe revert as commit 0317e6c0f1dc ("i2c: designware: do not disable adapter after transfer") was also reverted and this revert doesn't seem to cause conflicts. -- Jarkko